• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Tag Archives: Unfair Trade Practices

prAna vs. apana…are you confused?

12 Thursday Jul 2018

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law False Advertising, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Oregon Unfair Trade Practices Act, Unfair Trade Practices, Unjust Enrichment, Yoga, Youlee Yim You

The Plaintiff in this trademark lawsuit sells “sustainable clothing for yoga, travel, and outdoor adventure enthusiasts” using the PRANA word mark and logo. The PRANA trademark has been used since as early as 1992, and even this non-yogi is aware of the well-known brand.

The Defendants are accused of selling yoga apparel under the confusingly similar name “apana,” coupled with a logo that Plaintiff feels is confusingly similar to prAna’s distinctive logo design.

Here are the trademarks…you be the judge:

Of course, we’re dealing with yoga, so the Complaint was bound to get a little weird:

“Like “prana,” “apana” is also well-known to those who practice yoga, and is closely related as the balancing vayu to the prana-vayu. It is situated in the pelvic floor, and reflects energy that moves downwards and outwards.” “prana and apana are opposing, yet balanced forces. Where ‘prana’ regulates the intake of particles and energy, ‘apana’ is responsible for the elimination of the unabsorbed residues.” Assuming regular yoga folks know all this, wouldn’t that be an argument against confusion?

What do you think…are the trademarks confusingly similar? Sound off in the comments below and stay tuned for updates. This one could get interesting.

prAna Living, LLC v. IFG Corp. et al.

Court Case Number: 3:18-cv-01174-YY
File Date: Monday, July 2, 2018
Plaintiff: prAna Living, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Nicolas F. Aldrich, Angela E. Addae of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.
Defendant: IFG Corp., Adjmi Apparel Group LLC
Causes: Federal Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Federal Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law False Advertising, Common Law Unfair Competition, Unfair Trade Practices, Unjust Enrichment
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Youlee Yim You

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – adidas America et al v. Skechers USA

24 Thursday Sep 2015

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, John Jelderks, State Trademark Dilution, Trade Dress Infringement, Trademark Infringement, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Unfair Competition, Unfair Trade Practices

adidas has a long history with Skechers. In 1994, adidas filed suit for trademark infringement over Skechers‘s Karl Kani footwear. The companies entered into a settlement agreement the following year (the “1995 Agreement,” attached below). Under this agreement, Skechers acknowledged that adidas is the exclusive owner of the THREE STRIPE DESIGN, agreed not to use the THREE STRIPE DESIGN or any mark confusingly similar thereto, and agreed to cease distribution of its KARL KANI sport shoe.

Between 2008 and 2013, adidas and Skechers allegedly entered into five separate confidential settlement agreements about infringements and dilutions of the Three-Stripe Mark. This most recent complaint from adidas claims that “notwithstanding the 1995 Agreement and the subsequent 2008-2013 Agreements–and in continuing, blatant disregard of adidas‘s rights–Skechers yet again is . . . selling footwear . . . bearing a confusingly similar imitation of the adidas Marks.”

adidas is especially aggrieved about a shoe that is (allegedly) confusingly similar to their famous Stan Smith shoe and claims that Skechers intends their “Stan Smith Knock-Off” shoe to be confusingly similar to the adidas Trade Dress and offers evidence that the Skechers website included the terms “stan smith” and “adidas original” in the source code.

adidas America Inc. et al v. Skechers USA Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:15-cv-01741-JE
File Date: Monday, September 14, 2015
Plaintiff: adidas America Inc., adidas AG, Adidas International Marketing B.V.
Plaintiff Counsel: Stephen M. Feldman of Perkins Coie LLP
Defendant: Skechers USA Inc.
Cause: Federal Trademark and Trade Dress Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark and Trade Dress Dilution, State Trademark Dilution with respect to the Three-Stripe Mark, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition, Breach of Contract
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge John Jelderks

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

1995 Agreement:

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – adidas America v. Forever 21

18 Tuesday Aug 2015

Posted by John Taggart in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Michael H. Simon, State Trademark Dilution, Trademark Counterfeiting, Trademark Infringement, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Unfair Competition, Unfair Trade Practices

Adidas has filed a complaint alleging that clothing retailer, Forever 21, and clothing manufacturer/distributor, Central Mills, have been selling counterfeit adidas clothing. In the complaint, adidas alleges Defendants have been importing and selling “apparel bearing three stripes that constitute counterfeit and/or confusingly similar imitations of adidas’s Three-Stripe Mark,” and included pictures of two examples (see Complaint below).

In 2013, Forever 21 and Central Mills were sued by fashion photograher, Mark Hunter, for copyright infringement. Hunter alleged that Defendants used one of his photographs on clothing without authorization. That case was settled out of court less than four months after the complaint was filed.

adidas America Inc. et al v. Forever 21 Inc. et al

Court Case Number: 3:15-cv-01559
File Date: Monday, August 17, 2015
Plaintiff: adidas America Inc., adidas AG
Plaintiff Counsel: Stephen M. Feldman of Perkins Coie LLP
Defendant: Forever 21 Inc., Central Mills Inc.
Cause: Counterfeiting, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, State Trademark Dilution
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Michael H. Simon

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Pacwest Development, LLC v. Pacwest II, L.L.C.

21 Thursday Feb 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ann L. Aiken, Federal Unfair Trade Practices, Litigation Update, State Trademark Dilution, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Trade Practices

Pacwest Development, LLC v. Pacwest II, L.L.C.

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00300-AA
File Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Plaintiff: Pacwest Development, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Todd R. Johnston of Hershner Hunter LLP
Defendant: Pacwest II, L.L.C.
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Trade Practice, Unfair Trade Practice, Dilution
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Adidas America v. Shoe Shoe Express

13 Tuesday Dec 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Adidas, Counterfeiting, Federal Trademark Dilution, Inc., John V. Acosta, Perkins Coie, Shoe Express, State Trademark Dilution, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Unfair Trade Practices

Adidas America, Inc et al v. Shoe Shoe Express, Inc. et al

Plaintiff Adidas is suing Defendant for selling apparel that allegedly infringes upon the Three-Stripe Mark and 3-Bars logo.

Related case: Adidas v. Preschoolians

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01501-AC
File Date: Monday, December 12, 2011
Plaintiff: Adidas America, Inc, adidas AG
Plaintiff Counsel: Stephen M. Feldman of Perkins Coie, LLP
Defendant: Shoe Shoe Express, Inc., Luis A. Gonzalez
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Counterfeiting, Unfair Competition, Unfair Trade Practices, Federal Trademark Dilution, State Trademark Dilution
Court:
 District Court of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Adidas v. Preschoolians Co.

06 Tuesday Dec 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Adidas, Ann L. Aiken, Deceptive Trade Practices, Federal Trademark Dilution, Injury to Business Reputation, Preschoolians Co., State Trademark Dilution, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Unfair Trade Practices

Adidas America, Inc et al v. Preschoolians Company et al

Adidas has brought this lawsuit to prevent Preschoolians from manufacturing and selling shoes bearing confusingly similar two-, three-, and four-stripe imitations of Adidas’s Three-Stripe Mark.

 

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01459-AA
File Date: Monday, December 05, 2011
Plaintiff: Adidas America, Inc., Adidas, AG
Plaintiff Counsel: Stephen M. Feldman of Perkins Coie, LLP
Defendant: Preschoolians Company, Jeffrey Silverman
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Federal Trademark Dilution, State Trademark Dilution, Injury to Business Reputation
Court: District Court of Oregon
Judge: Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Danger Ninja Productions v. Estee Lauder

04 Friday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Portland

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Copyright Misattribution, DMCA Violation, Kurt M. Rylander, Mark E. Beatty, Paul Papak, Photography, Unfair Trade Practices

Danger Ninja Productions et al v. Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. et al

Plaintiff, a Portland-based photographer, alleges that cosmetic giant Estee Lauder used one of his images (DRIPPING BLACK…see below) without authorization on magazine covers and in connection with in-store campaigns.

Can you spot Daniel Hoyt’s image in the MAC ad below?

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01321-PK
File Date: Thursday, November 03, 2011
Plaintiff: Danger Ninja Productions, Daniel Hoyt
Plaintiff Counsel: Kurt M. Rylander, Mark E. Beatty of Rylander & Associates PC
Defendant: Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.
Make-Up Art Cosmetics, Inc.
M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Copyright Misattribution, DMCA Violation, Unfair Trade Practices
Court: District Court of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Paul Papak

View this document on Scribd

Related story: Evelyn Lauder dead at 75

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Christopher Douglas v. Leigh Keno

07 Friday Oct 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, Thomas Freedman, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Unfair Trade Practices

Christopher Douglas v. Leigh Keno et al

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01204-BR
File Date: Thursday, October 06, 2011
Plaintiff: Christopher Douglas
Plaintiff Counsel: Thomas Freedman, Jr. of Pearl Law LLC
Defendant: Leigh Keno, Leslie Keno, Theodore Alexendar USA, Inc
Cause: Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act), Unfair Competition, Unfair Trade Practices
Court: District Court of Oregon
Judge: Judge Anna J. Brown

View this document on Scribd

Categories

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...