• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Tag Archives: Janice M. Stewart

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Herb Pharm v. Medical Wellness Associates

03 Tuesday Dec 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Infringement, Federal Trademark Infringement, Janice M. Stewart, Litigation Update

Plaintiff, Herb Pharm, based in Williams, Oregon (south of Grants Pass), has used the SUPER ECHINACEA trademark in connection with “herbal, dietary and nutritional supplements” since 1984. Defendant, a Pennsylvania corporation, has allegedly begun selling over-the-counter herbal Echinacea products under the same trademark. Defendant’s failure to comply with a cease and desist request led to this lawsuit. 

EchinaceaFYI, echinacea is widely used to fight infections, especially the common cold and other upper respiratory infections. Echinacea is also used against the flu, urinary tract infections, vaginal yeast infections, genital herpes, bloodstream infections (septicemia), gum disease, tonsillitis, streptococcus infections, syphilis, typhoid, malaria, and diphtheria. Echinicea is a member of the daisy family and commonly called a coneflower. 

Herb Pharm, LLC v. Martin P Gallagher et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-02133
File Date: Tuesday, December 03, 2013
Plaintiff: Herb Pharm, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: John D. Ostrander, Tyler J. Volm of Elliott Ostrander & Preston, PC
Defendant: Martin P Gallagher, Medical Wellness Associates, P.C.
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Contributory Infringement
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Janice M. Stewart

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Upsource, LLC v. Upsource, Inc.

21 Monday Oct 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement, Janice M. Stewart, Litigation Update

This trademark dispute is between Upsource, LLC, an Oregon-based internet marketing company and Upsource, Inc., a Massachusetts-based call center and customer service outsourcing company, over the use rights to the mark Upsource and the domain name upsource.com. In response to a recent cease-and-desist letter, the Oregon-based Upsource, LLC, seeks a declaration that its use of the Upsource mark and upsource.com domain name is not violative of the rights of Upsource the call center.

Upsource, LLC v. Upsource, Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01862-ST
File Date: Friday, October 18, 2013
Plaintiff: Upsource, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Phil A. Nelson of Slinde & Nelson LLC
Defendant: Upsource, Inc.
Cause: Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Yeti Enterprises v. Orion Tang

18 Thursday Jul 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Contract, Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Common Law Fraud, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Declaratory Judgment, False Advertising, Fraud, Janice M. Stewart, Litigation Update, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Yeti Enterprises Incorporated v. Orion Tang et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01203-ST
File Date: Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Plaintiff: Yeti Enterprises Incorporated
Plaintiff Counsel: Daniel C. Occhipinti of Stoel Rives LLP
Defendant: Orion Tang, NPK, LLC
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, False Advertising, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Fraud, Common Law Fraud, Breach of Contract, Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Declaratory Judgment
Court:  District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart

Complaint (removed from Multnomah County Circuit Court):

View this document on Scribd

Response 

View this document on Scribd

 

UPDATED [7/30/14]: The following documents provide more insight into the litigation.

Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims

View this document on Scribd

Defendants’ Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims

View this document on Scribd

 

 

 

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Metal-Tech Cage v. Jason DeMello

22 Wednesday Feb 2012

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ 2 Comments

Tags

Janice M. Stewart, Klarquist Sparkman, Metal-Tech Cage, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Metal-Tech Cage, LLC v. Jason DeMello et al

Court Case Number: 3:12-cv-00308-ST
File Date: Tuesday, February 21, 2012
Plaintiff: Metal-Tech Cage, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Kevin M. Hayes of Klarquist Sparkman LLP
Defendant: Jason DeMello, DeMello Offroad
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart

View this document on Scribd
Newer posts →

Categories

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...