• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Author Archives: Kenan Farrell

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Penguin Group v. American Buddha

23 Saturday Mar 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Dennis J. Hubel, Litigation Update

New York-based publisher Penguin Group’s battle against Oregon-based nonprofit American Buddha continues in Oregon after being dismissed in New York for lack of personal jurisdiction. American Buddha has uploaded complete copies of books and other media onto American Buddha’s online library that is accessible by some 50,000 members at no charge. Four of the books posted belong to mega-publisher Penguin, which claims copyright infringement. American Buddha claims (in the American Buddha Online Library Copyright Notice) to be operating safely under 17 U.S.C. Section 108, which exempts libraries and archives from liability for creating reproductions (under certain conditions). It seems a stretch to apply Section 108 to PDFs posted on a website but American Buddha claims to impose “contractual and technical limitations on access to the archive” that could potentially bring it within the contours of 108. “Library” isn’t defined in the Copyright Act but the context of 108 suggests it be interpreted in the traditional manner, as a real, physical location, not an online repository. It seems yet another part of the Copyright Act that might need clarification in the digital age. Stay tuned as the parties sort it out.

Penguin Group(USA) Inc. v. American Buddha

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00497-HU
File Date: Friday, March 22, 2013
Plaintiff: Penguin Group(USA) Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Duane A. Bosworth, II, Timothy M. Cunningham of Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP
Defendant: American Buddha
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – The Thompsons Film v. Does 1-155

20 Wednesday Mar 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Copyright Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright, Litigation Update, Thomas M. Coffin

The Thompsons Film, LLC v. Does 1-155

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00469-TC
File Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Plaintiff: The Thompsons Film, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell, Jonathan T. van Heel of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1-155
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin

View this document on Scribd

 

See other Oregon Download Cases.

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – The Coast Distribution System v. Ezra Distributing

16 Saturday Mar 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Dennis J. Hubel, Litigation Update, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

The Coast Distribution System Inc. v. Ezra Distributing, Inc. et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00451-HU
File Date: Friday, March 15, 2013
Plaintiff: The Coast Distribution System Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Charles H. DeVoe, Thomas James Romano of Kolisch Hartwell, PC
Defendant: Ezra Distributing, Inc., Ezra Retail LLC
Cause: Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition; Common Law Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, and Dilution
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Leonard D. Duboff v. University of Chicago

15 Friday Mar 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Litigation Update, Michael H. Simon, Trademark Infringement

Here’s a trademark dispute involving book titles. Plaintiff writes a series of industry-focused legal education books called “The Law, in Plain English for [insert industry]” (some examples are Photographers, Restaurants, Writers). Essentially, the books are an attempt to help regular folks understand the law that applies to their industry, explained not with legal jargon but “in plain English.”

Defendants publish a book “Legal Writing in Plain English,” frequently used by law students as a textbook in their legal writing courses. It teaches future lawyers (and current lawyers) to write laws and contracts that regular folks can understand, not written in legal jargon but “in plain English.”

Are the books sold in the same marketplace or two independent marketplaces? Industry folks buy one set of books, attorneys buy the other, presumably all for the greater good of comprehensible law. Authors suing authors, lawyers suing lawyers…this could get interesting. Stay tuned for updates.

Leonard D. Duboff v. University of Chicago et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00436-SI
File Date: Thursday, March 14, 2013
Plaintiff: Leonard D. Duboff
Plaintiff Counsel: Anthony Edward McNamer, Deborah E. Gumm of McNamer and Company, PC
Defendant: University of Chicago, Lawprose, Inc., Bryan A. Garner
Cause: Trademark Infringement
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Judge Michael H. Simon

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Naked Wines LLC v. Mustache Mentors, Inc.

09 Saturday Mar 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

False Designation of Origin, Litigation Update, Marco A. Hernandez, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices

Hood River-based Naked Winery is pursuing a new San Francisco-based winemaker, Naked Rebel Winery, for trademark infringement. It’s not necessarily a slam-dunk case, as there are several other “naked-formative” trademarks used in connection with wine.  Naked Rebel filed it’s own trademark application back in December although there’s been no action yet by a Trademark Examiner. However, based on rejections received in other “naked” applications, it seems the Naked Rebel crew may have to overcome both this lawsuit and then a 2(d) refusal in order to successfully use and register their trademark.

Trademark practitioners, do you prefer to file a trademark complaint prior to an Examiner’s review of a pending trademark application or do you wait for an Examiner’s 2(d) refusal? I’m curious as to your thoughts in either direction.

Naked Wines LLC v. Mustache Mentors, Inc. et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00402-HZ
File Date: Friday, March 08, 2013
Plaintiff: Naked Wines LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Hillary A. Brooks, Delfina S. Homen of Marger Johnson & McCollom, PC
Defendant: Mustache Mentors, Inc., Mustache Mentors LLC
Cause: Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin and Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Judge Marco A. Hernandez

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Crave Bake Shop v. Crave

08 Friday Mar 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement, Litigation Update

Is the nation large enough for two bakeries with the word “Crave” in the title? Crave Bake Shop, of Lake Oswego, Oregon, thinks so…and filed this Declaratory Judgment action to get a San Francisco-based Crave off their back. Stay tuned.

Crave Bake Shop, LLC v. Crave, LLC

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00392-BR
File Date: Thursday, March 07, 2013
Plaintiff: Crave Bake Shop, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Elizabeth A. Tedesco Milesnick of Miller Nash LLP
Defendant: Crave, LLC
Cause: Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Judge Anna J. Brown

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 16

27 Wednesday Feb 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Copyright Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright, Litigation Update, Mark D. Clarke

Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 16

Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00333-CL
File Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Plaintiff: Elf-Man, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1 – 16
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke

View this document on Scribd

 

See other Oregon Download Cases.

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 57

27 Wednesday Feb 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Copyright Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright, Litigation Update, Thomas M. Coffin

Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 57

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00331-TC
File Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Plaintiff: Elf-Man, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1 – 57
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin

View this document on Scribd

 

See other Oregon Download Cases.

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1-107

26 Tuesday Feb 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Copyright Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright, John V. Acosta, Litigation Update

Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1-107

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00334-AC
File Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Plaintiff: Elf-Man, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1-107
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta

View this document on Scribd

 

See other Oregon Download Cases.

List of Oregon Download Cases – 2013/14

26 Tuesday Feb 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Privacy, Social Media

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

BitTorrent, Elf-Man, RynoRyder Productions, The Thompsons Film, Voltage Pictures

This is a comprehensive list of Oregon download cases. Follow the links to individual case details. This post will be updated as new cases are filed.

  1. Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1 – 371
  2. Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1 – 198
  3. Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1 – 12
  4. Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1 – 34
  5. Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 57
  6. Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 16
  7. Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 107
  8. The Thompsons Film, LLC v. Does 1 – 155
  9. RynoRyder Productions, Inc. v. Does 1 – 23
  10. Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Doe IP 76.115.46.230
  11. Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Jim Choi
  12. Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Doe Adult Son
  13. Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-50

Last update: 4/30/14

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar