• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Tag Archives: Trademark Infringement

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Nike v. Ho et al

29 Tuesday Apr 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Contract, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Conversion, Fraud, Litigation Update, Michael W. Mosman, Trademark Infringement

Defendants Yamaguchi and Ho are alleged to have used their position as managers at Nike to steal unique and/or custom athletic footwear in order to profit from the sale of those shoes to collectors of rare athletic shoes, known in the industry as “Sneakerheads.” These defendants allegedly lied to Nike and its manufacturers by misrepresenting that the shoes would be used for promotional and marketing purposes in order to trick them into manufacturing inventory for the illicit scheme. Defendant Keating allegedly acted as the middle-man in the unlawful enterprise by knowingly purchasing and re-selling the stolen footwear obtained by Yamaguchi and Ho.

Nike brings this action to recover the stolen shoes, recover the illicit gains obtained by Defendants from the sale of the stolen goods, to obtain an injunction preventing Defendants from continuing to participate in the illicit sale of stolen Nike goods, and to seek an award of punitive damages.

Nike Swoosh Registration

 

Nike Inc. v. Tung Wing Ho et al

Court Case Number: 3:14-cv-00696-MO
File Date: Monday, April 28, 2014
Plaintiff: Nike Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Paul H. Trinchero, Robert C. Weaver Jr. of Garvey Schubert Barer
Defendant: Tung Wing Ho, Denise Wei-Ching Yee, Kyle Keoki Yamaguchi, Shu-Chu Yamaguchi, Jason M. Keating
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Conversion, Fraud, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Breach of Contract
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Michael W. Mosman

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Nike v. DBV Distribution

12 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Cancellation of Trademarks, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Litigation Update, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Nike, Inc. v. DBV Distribution, Inc. et al

Court Case Number: 3:14-cv-00040-ST
File Date: Wednesday, January 08, 2014
Plaintiff: Nike, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Jon P. Stride of Tonkon Torp LLP
Defendant: DBV Distribution, Inc., Dragon Bleu, Sarl
Cause: Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Cancellation of Trademarks
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – AXTS v. Arms Unlimited

27 Wednesday Nov 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ann L. Aiken, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Litigation Update, Oregon Unfair Trade Practices Act, Trademark Counterfeiting, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Plaintiff AXTS is an Oregon corporation based in Salem, Oregon. AXTS designs, manufactures, and sells firearm accessories, including the RAPTOR charging handle at issue in this litigation. Plaintiff Rainer Arms is a Washington-based company that co-brands the RAPTOR charging handle.

Defendant Arms Unlimited has allegedly sold counterfeit RAPTOR charging handles on eBay, Amazon and its own website. This lawsuit was brought against Arms Unlimited and its individual owners.

Stay tuned for updates.

FYI, a charging handle (see image below) is a device on a firearm which, when operated, results in the hammer or striker being cocked or moved to the ready position. The devices can vary significantly between firearms.

Charging Handle

AXTS Inc. et al v. Arms Unlimited Inc. et al

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-02100-AA
File Date: Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Plaintiff: AXTS Inc., Rainier Arms, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Jon P. Stride, David M. Weiler of Tonkon Torp LLP
Defendant: Arms Unlimited Inc., Daniel Shamie, Josh Salama
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Trademark Counterfeiting, Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Oregon Unfair Trade Practices Act, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Hinrichs, Proudfoot and Skov v. McBassi and Company

08 Tuesday Oct 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, Litigation Update, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Hinrichs, Proudfoot and Skov, Inc. v. McBassi and Company, Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01784
File Date: Monday, October 07, 2013
Plaintiff: Hinrichs, Proudfoot and Skov, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Kevin M. Hayes of Klarquist Sparkman, LLP
Defendant: McBassi and Company, Inc.
Cause: Unfair Competition, Trademark Infringement
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Anna J. Brown

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Nationwide Process Service v. Nationwide Legal

27 Tuesday Aug 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Litigation Update, Marco A. Hernandez, State Trademark Dilution, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Nationwide Process Service, Inc. v. Nationwide Legal, LLC.

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01500-HZ
File Date: Monday, August 26, 2013
Plaintiff: Nationwide Process Service, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Brad C. Stanford, Patricia A. Walsh of Fairleigh Wada Witt PC
Defendant: Nationwide Legal, LLC.
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Trademark Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Marco A. Hernandez

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Seaberg Company v. Dynarex Corporation

23 Tuesday Jul 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Michael W. Mosman, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Seaberg Company, Inc. v. Dynarex Corporation et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01244-MO
File Date: Monday, July 22, 2013
Plaintiff: Seaberg Company, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Donald B. Haslett, Susan D. Pitchford of Chernoff Vilhauer McClung & Stenzel LLP
Defendant: Dynarex Corporation, SOS Survival Products, Inc.
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Michael W. Mosman

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Yeti Enterprises v. Orion Tang

18 Thursday Jul 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Contract, Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Common Law Fraud, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Declaratory Judgment, False Advertising, Fraud, Janice M. Stewart, Litigation Update, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Yeti Enterprises Incorporated v. Orion Tang et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01203-ST
File Date: Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Plaintiff: Yeti Enterprises Incorporated
Plaintiff Counsel: Daniel C. Occhipinti of Stoel Rives LLP
Defendant: Orion Tang, NPK, LLC
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, False Advertising, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Fraud, Common Law Fraud, Breach of Contract, Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Declaratory Judgment
Court:  District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart

Complaint (removed from Multnomah County Circuit Court):

View this document on Scribd

Response 

View this document on Scribd

 

UPDATED [7/30/14]: The following documents provide more insight into the litigation.

Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims

View this document on Scribd

Defendants’ Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims

View this document on Scribd

 

 

 

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Shea Family Corp.

22 Wednesday May 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Passing Off, ORS 20.080 and 20.082, Thomas M. Coffin, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

This is related to the Slep-Tone v. Denny’s lawsuit filed 1/11/13. Defendant is this case, Shea Family Corp, requested to be severed from the original lawsuit.

Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Shea Family Corp.

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00862-TC
File Date: Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Plaintiff: Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell, Jonathan T. van Heel of Crowell Law
Defendant: Shea Family Corp.
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Common Law Passing Off, ORS 20.080 and 20.082
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Brewing Co. sues D.C. restaurant, Rogue 24, for trademark infringement

12 Sunday May 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

False Designation of Origin, Trademark Counterfeiting, Trademark Cybersquatting, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Oregon Brewing Co., otherwise known as Rogue Ales, has sued a D.C. restaurant, Rogue 24, for trademark infringement, trademark counterfeiting and trademark cyber-squatting, among other claims.

The Washington Times has more information about the parties and the Complaint is below. Stay tuned for updates.

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Technivorm v. Boyd Coffee Company

07 Tuesday May 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Contract, Declaratory Relief, Litigation Update, Paul Papak, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Despite the termination of a distributorship license, Defendant allegedly continues to market itself as the exclusive United States importer and distributor of Netherlands-based Technivorm’s Moccamaster coffee makers on the internet. This case was transferred from the Northern District of Illinois.

Technivorm, B.V. v. Boyd Coffee Company et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00762-PK
File Date: Monday, May 06, 2013
Plaintiff: Technivorm, B.V.
Plaintiff Counsel: Todd Alan Holleman of Miller, Canfield, Paddock And Stone, PLC
Defendant: Boyd Coffee Company, Boyd Coffee Distribution Company
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Breach of Conract, Unfair Competition, Declaratory Relief
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Paul Papak

View this document on Scribd
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...