• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Tag Archives: Litigation Update

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Random Lengths Publications v. Sprenger Midwest

16 Wednesday Oct 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Contract, Copyright Infringement, Litigation Update, Thomas M. Coffin

Random Lengths Publications, Inc. v. Sprenger Midwest, Inc.

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-01833-TC
File Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2013
Plaintiff: Random Lengths Publications, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: J. Peter Staples of Chernoff Vilhauer McClung & Stenzel, LLP
Defendant: Sprenger Midwest, Inc.
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Breach of Contract
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Twentieth Century Fox v. The Rogue Theatre

08 Tuesday Oct 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Litigation Update, Owen M. Panner, Rocky Horror

This case involves a planned showing of the Rocky Horror Picture Show in Grants Pass, Oregon on October 25-26. Defendant, the Rogue Theater, has shown the film annually since at least 2010 without authorization from Plaintiff. Plaintiff has brought this lawsuit to prevent the unauthorized exhibition of the film this year.

Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation v. The Rogue Theatre, Inc.

Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-01785-PA
File Date: Monday, October 07, 2013
Plaintiff: Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Clifford S. Davidson of Sussman Shank LLP
Defendant: The Rogue Theatre, Inc.
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Owen M. Panner

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Hinrichs, Proudfoot and Skov v. McBassi and Company

08 Tuesday Oct 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, Litigation Update, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Hinrichs, Proudfoot and Skov, Inc. v. McBassi and Company, Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01784
File Date: Monday, October 07, 2013
Plaintiff: Hinrichs, Proudfoot and Skov, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Kevin M. Hayes of Klarquist Sparkman, LLP
Defendant: McBassi and Company, Inc.
Cause: Unfair Competition, Trademark Infringement
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Anna J. Brown

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Vortx v. ChannelAdvisor

27 Friday Sep 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

1203(a), Circumvention of Copyright Protection System, Litigation Update, Mark D. Clarke

Here’s an interesting claim we don’t see all the time…Circumvention of Copyright Protection System. Defendant ChannelAdvisor allegedly created software computer code for the purpose of avoiding, bypassing, deactivating, or impairing Plaintiff Vortx’s licensing mechanism that controlled access to Plaintiff’s copyrighted aspdotnetstorefront software.

Vortx, Inc. v. Channeladvisor Corporation

Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-01708-CL
File Date: Wednesday, September 25, 2013
Plaintiff: Vortx, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Michael A. Gehret of Snell & Wilmer, LLP
Defendant: ChannelAdvisor Corporation
Cause: Circumvention of Copyright Protection System
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Coast Distribution System v. Buyers Products Company

25 Wednesday Sep 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Copyright Infringement, Functionality, Litigation Update, Marco A. Hernandez, Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition

The Coast Distribution System Inc. v. Buyers Products Company

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01699-HZ
File Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Plaintiff: The Coast Distribution System Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Charles H. DeVoe, David C. Bourgeau, III, Thomas James Romano of Kolish Hartwell, PC
Defendant: Buyers Products Company
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Marco A. Hernandez

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Nationwide Process Service v. Nationwide Legal

27 Tuesday Aug 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Litigation Update, Marco A. Hernandez, State Trademark Dilution, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Nationwide Process Service, Inc. v. Nationwide Legal, LLC.

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01500-HZ
File Date: Monday, August 26, 2013
Plaintiff: Nationwide Process Service, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Brad C. Stanford, Patricia A. Walsh of Fairleigh Wada Witt PC
Defendant: Nationwide Legal, LLC.
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Trademark Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Marco A. Hernandez

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – EasyPower v. Operation Technology

22 Thursday Aug 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trade Secret

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, John Jelderks, Litigation Update, Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, Software

EasyPower, LLC v. Operation Technology, Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01462-JE
File Date: Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Plaintiff: EasyPower, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: John C. Rake, Susan D. Marmaduke of Harrang Long Gary Rudnick PC
Defendant: Operation Technology, Inc.
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge John Jelderks

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – City of Portland v. Romtec

20 Tuesday Aug 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Portland

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Copyright Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Dilution, Litigation Update, Michael W. Mosman, Oregon Uniform Trade Practices Act, Trade Dress Infringement, Unfair Competition

Portland Loo v. Sidewalk ToiletThe first Portland Loo was installed on December 8, 2008, “to enormous media attention.” Portland has used the Loo to capitalize on its reputation as a “green” innovator and has sold the Loo to various municipalities including: Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Alaska, and Victoria and Nanaimo in British Columbia, Canada. The City is currently negotiating to sell Portland Loos to Esquimalt, British Columbia, San Diego, California, and Seattle, Washington.

In January 2013, Portland city officials were informed by an official with the City of Cincinnati, that Defendant Romtec was manufacturing and marketing for sale a restroom substantially and strikingly similar to the Portland Loo called the “Sidewalk Restroom.” Romtec first introduced its Sidewalk Restroom in late 2012.

Portland alleges that Romtec’s Sidewalk Restroom is “substantially and strikingly similar to the distinctive Portland Loo in its total overall expression, appearance, configuration, size, description, and promotion and features key elements that appear to have been copied from the Protected Work including, but not limited to: (a) the placement, size, position, and dimensions of its louvers; (b) the choice of metal wall panels; (c) use of an anti-graffiti powder coating; (d) the stripped down plumbing that facilitates its set-in-place installation; (e) placement of the sink on the exterior of the unit; and (f) dedicated space for art and advertising.”

This lawsuit was brought by Portland to prevent the sale of the Sidewalk Restroom. More background is included in the Complaint (below). Stay tuned for updates.

City of Portland Oregon v. Romtec, Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01453-MO
File Date: Monday, August 19, 2013
Plaintiff: City of Portland Oregon
Plaintiff Counsel: Lisa M. Gramp – Attorney at Law
Defendant: Romtec, Inc.
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Trade Dress Infringement, Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Common Law Dilution, Oregon Uniform Trade Practices Act
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Michael W. Mosman

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Art Litigation Update – Independence Collection v. Tala Madani

13 Tuesday Aug 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Declaratory Relief - 17 USC 106A, Declaratory Relief - Quiet Title, Injunctive Relief - Non-Interference, Litigation Update, Michael J. McShane, Visual Artists Rights Act

A renowned Iranian-born artist and Oregon State graduate is in a legal battle to prevent the sale of 114 of her paintings found at a storage locker auction.

Tala Madani attended Oregon State University, obtaining a BFA in Visual Arts and BA in Political Science in 2004, prior to obtaining her MFA from Yale University in 2006. While at Oregon State, Madani was awarded the President’s Award for Excellence in Art. Like many undergraduates headed off to graduate school, sometime between Corvallis and New Haven, Madani stashed her belongings in a storage locker at Polk County Storage in Independence, Oregon, including 114 paintings, some dating back to when Madani was in 6th grade.

Subsequently (dates aren’t included in the Complaint), Madani failed to maintain payments for the storage locker and the contents were sold at auction.

Brad Daily and Mike Claxton, principals of Independence Collection (“Independence”), won the contents of Madani’s locker at a storage locker auction.  Upon examining the contents of their new locker, Independence discovered the 114 paintings, along with other personal items, including photo ID cards, personal photographs and negatives and a handwritten journal.

The Complaint indicates Independence “contacted [Madani] in an attempt to return the personal items.” They also “discussed the return of several of the paintings believed to be of notable value, but negotiations quickly degenerated.”

Apparently unable to successfully transfer the paintings back to Madani, Independence then made several attempts to sell the paintings. However, they were repeatedly thwarted by Madani, who has claimed that any sale, in addition to criminal penalties, would subject Independence and complicit auction houses to claims under the Visual Artists Rights Act. As such, Independence has brought this lawsuit to obtain a Declaratory Judgment of Ownership (and right to sell) the Madani paintings.

Stay tuned for updates.

Independence Collection, LLC v. Tala Madani

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-01397-MC
File Date: Sunday, August 11, 2013
Plaintiff: Independence Collection, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Tala Madani
Cause: Declaratory Relief – Quiet Title, Injunctive Relief – Non-Interference, Declaratory Relief – 17 USC 106A
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Michael J. McShane

Declaratory Judgment of Ownership:

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Yeti Enterprises v. Orion Tang

18 Thursday Jul 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Contract, Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Common Law Fraud, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Declaratory Judgment, False Advertising, Fraud, Janice M. Stewart, Litigation Update, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Yeti Enterprises Incorporated v. Orion Tang et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01203-ST
File Date: Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Plaintiff: Yeti Enterprises Incorporated
Plaintiff Counsel: Daniel C. Occhipinti of Stoel Rives LLP
Defendant: Orion Tang, NPK, LLC
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, False Advertising, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Fraud, Common Law Fraud, Breach of Contract, Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Declaratory Judgment
Court:  District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart

Complaint (removed from Multnomah County Circuit Court):

View this document on Scribd

Response 

View this document on Scribd

 

UPDATED [7/30/14]: The following documents provide more insight into the litigation.

Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims

View this document on Scribd

Defendants’ Answer and Affirmative Defenses to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint and Counterclaims

View this document on Scribd

 

 

 

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...