• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Tag Archives: Federal Trademark Infringement

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – B.C. Marketing Concepts v. The Sessions Law Firm

09 Wednesday Jul 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Federal Trademark Dilution, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Litigation Update, Michael H. Simon, State Law Product Disparagement, State Trademark Dilution, State Trademark Infringement, State Unfair Competition, Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations

Session, Sessions LawHere’s yet another trademark lawsuit involving a brewery. This time, however, the defendant isn’t another brewery but a DUI attorney using an allegedly confusingly similar logo.

Plaintiff B. C. Marketing, Inc. is an Oregon corporation based in Hood River, Oregon. Plaintiff does business as Full Sail Brewing Company. Since at least as early as 2005, Plaintiff has been selling beer under the trademark SESSION, including a distinctive shield logo trademark.

Defendant is an Atlanta, Georgia-based DUI attorney that has been using a similar logo to promote his legal services to “beer drinkers.”

Take a look at the two logos. Confusingly similar? Note that Defendant has been using the logo on paper bags “designed and distributed for the express purpose of holding a can or bottle of beer.” (See image in Complaint below.) While this may have seemed like a cute marketing idea at the time, surely the Defendant can’t be so invested in his logo as to justify litigation in federal court. I expect this lawsuit will be resolved fairly quickly…stay tuned for updates.

B.C. Marketing Concepts Inc. v. The Sessions Law Firm LLC

Court Case Number: 3:14-cv-01087
File Date: Tuesday, July 08, 2014
Plaintiff: B.C. Marketing Concepts Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Charles H. DeVoe, Thomas J. Romano of Kolisch Hartwell PC
Defendant: The Sessions Law Firm LLC
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, State Trademark Infringement, State Unfair Competition, State Trademark Dilution, State Law Product Disparagement, Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Michael H. Simon

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – iovation v. IOvations

29 Thursday May 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Infringement, Litigation Update, Paul Papak, Unfair Competition

Plaintiff iovation, based in Portland, Oregon, sells computer security and fraud prevention services to customers internationally. Plaintiff has used the term IOVATION as a trade name and trademark since at least as early as June 1, 2004.iovation Screen Shot

Defendant IOvations, of Massachusetts, was organized on July 12, 2004. According to the Complaint, IOvations first limited the services it offered under the IOVATIONS mark to digital data storage solutions. More recently, IOvations has expanded the services it offers under the mark to include computer “network and security solutions.”

Given the similarity, both visually and aurally, between the IOVATION and IOVATIONS trademarks, the closely-related goods and services that the parties sell, and the parties’ overlapping channels of trade and classes of consumers, Plaintiff alleges that actual confusion between the parties and their respective marks is likely to continue and increase.

Failure to negotiate mutually-agreeable terms of coexistence led to this lawsuit.

iovation, Inc. v. IOvations, Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:14-cv-00838
File Date: Thursday, May 22, 2014
Plaintiff: iovation, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Stuart R. Dunwoody of Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Defendant: IOvations, Inc.
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Paul Papak

View this document on Scribd

 

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Too Marker Products v. Alvin and Company

12 Monday May 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Federal Trademark Infringement, John V. Acosta, Litigation Update, Unfair Competition

Plaintiff manufactures and sells high-end markers for illustrators and design professionals. Their markers have distinctive squarish bodies and distinctive squarish cap-ends, both protected by U.S. trademark registrations.

This lawsuit arises because the configuration of Defendant’s Heritage A-Line markers is alleged to be confusingly similar to the configuration denoted in the trademark registrations and the configuration of Plaintiffs’ COPIC line of markers.

 [Update 12/16/14]: This case has been settled and a final judgment entered along with a permanent injunction against the Defendant.

Final Judgment by Consent and Permanent Injunction:

View this document on Scribd

Too Marker Products, Inc. et al v. Alvin and Company, Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:14-cv-00773-AC
File Date: Friday, May 09, 2014
Plaintiff: Too Marker Products, Inc., Imagination International, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Timothy S. DeJong, Jacob S. Gill of Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Schlachter PC
Defendant: Alvin and Company, Inc.
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta

View this document on Scribd

 

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Pendleton Woolen Mills v. Kraff’s Men’s Wear Co.

17 Thursday Apr 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Contract, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Copyright Infringement, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Intentional Interference with Economic Relations, Litigation Update, Paul Papak

Plaintiff is a Portland, Oregon-based designer/manufacturer/retailer of high quality wool fabrics and apparel, and is known for its unique proprietary fabric and blanket designs. Plaintiff regularly enters into sales contracts with wholesale customers, who must agree that “The Purchaser will not sell the goods or any part thereof, to another dealer or to any other reseller, and will not sell the goods through the Internet without the written consent of [Plaintiff].” The 20 John Doe defendants are wholesale customers that have signed the sales contract. None were authorized to sell to Defendant Kraff’s, the primary target of the lawsuit.

Defendant Website ScreenshotDefendant Kraff’s is a retailer operating a clothing store that markets and sells apparel, blankets, and related products in Toppenish, Washington. From approximately 1941 until 2006, Kraff’s was a wholesale customer of Plaintiff. Kraff’s has allegedly continued to purchase product from a Doe defendant after termination of their sales contract with Plaintiff, thus making them an unauthorized reseller of Plaintiff’s goods. Plaintiff brings this lawsuit with numerous copyright claims based on their distinctive designs and trademark claims based on the unauthorized use of their company name.

Stay tuned for updates.

Pendleton Woolen Mills Inc. v. Kraff’s Men’s Wear Co. Inc. et al

Court Case Number: 3:14-cv-00628-PK
File Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Plaintiff: Pendleton Woolen Mills Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Parna A. Mehrbani, Vicki L. Smith of Lane Powell PC
Defendant: Kraff’s Men’s Wear Co. Inc., Daniel P. Johnson, John Doe Companies 1-20
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Intentional Interference with Economic Relations, Breach of Contract
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Paul Papak

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Raptor Archery v. Robert Maitland

10 Monday Feb 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Janice M. Stewart, Litigation Update

Archery_targetThis is a fairly straightforward trademark dispute over the use of the “RAPTOR” trademark in connection with archery equipment. Plaintiff is based in Hood River, Oregon. Defendant is based in Sparks, Nevada, which is located just east of Reno. Plaintiff has a federal registration since 1998 and has used their RAPTOR ARCHERY mark since 1991.

Raptor Archery, Inc. v. Robert Maitland

Court Case Number: 3:14-cv-00203
File Date: Thursday, February 06, 2014
Plaintiff: Raptor Archery, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: William H. Sumerfield of Phillips Reynier & Sumerfield
Defendant: Robert Maitland
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal False Designation of Origin or Source
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Janice M. Stewart

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Herb Pharm v. Medical Wellness Associates

03 Tuesday Dec 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Infringement, Federal Trademark Infringement, Janice M. Stewart, Litigation Update

Plaintiff, Herb Pharm, based in Williams, Oregon (south of Grants Pass), has used the SUPER ECHINACEA trademark in connection with “herbal, dietary and nutritional supplements” since 1984. Defendant, a Pennsylvania corporation, has allegedly begun selling over-the-counter herbal Echinacea products under the same trademark. Defendant’s failure to comply with a cease and desist request led to this lawsuit. 

EchinaceaFYI, echinacea is widely used to fight infections, especially the common cold and other upper respiratory infections. Echinacea is also used against the flu, urinary tract infections, vaginal yeast infections, genital herpes, bloodstream infections (septicemia), gum disease, tonsillitis, streptococcus infections, syphilis, typhoid, malaria, and diphtheria. Echinicea is a member of the daisy family and commonly called a coneflower. 

Herb Pharm, LLC v. Martin P Gallagher et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-02133
File Date: Tuesday, December 03, 2013
Plaintiff: Herb Pharm, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: John D. Ostrander, Tyler J. Volm of Elliott Ostrander & Preston, PC
Defendant: Martin P Gallagher, Medical Wellness Associates, P.C.
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Contributory Infringement
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Janice M. Stewart

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Pacific Cargo Control v. Quality Chain Corporation

02 Wednesday Oct 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Infringement, Michael W. Mosman, Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices

Pacific Cargo Control, Inc. v. Quality Chain Corporation

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01750-MO
File Date: Tuesday, October 01, 2013
Plaintiff: Pacific Cargo Control, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Hillary A. Brooks, Delfina S. Homen of Marger Johnson & McCollom, PC
Defendant: Quality Chain Corporation
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Michael W. Mosman

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Repar Corporation v. Willowood USA

25 Tuesday Jun 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trade Secret, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ann L. Aiken, Breach of Express Contract, Breach of Implied-in-Fact Contract, Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, Quasi-Contract/Unjust Enrichment

Here’s an interesting case…breach of a noncompete, trade secrets, trademark infringement, pesticides and even the EPA.

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-01043-AA
File Date: Thursday, June 20, 2013
Plaintiff: Repar Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Jeff S. Pitzer, Bryan S. Geon of Pitzer Law
Defendant: Willowood USA, LLC, Brian Heinze
Cause: Breach of Express Contract, Breach of Implied-in-Fact Contract, Quasi-Contract/Unjust Enrichment, Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – adidas America v. Wolverine World Wide

26 Saturday May 2012

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Dennis J. Hubel, Federal Trademark Dilution, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Injury to Business Reputation, Marco A. Hernandez, State Trademark Dilution, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Unfair Competition

adidas America, Inc. et al v. Wolverine World Wide Inc.

Court Case Number:    3:12-cv-00945-HZ
File Date:    Friday, May 25, 2012
Plaintiff:     adidas America, Inc., adidas AG
Plaintiff Counsel:     Stephen M. Feldman of Perkins Coie LLP
Charles H. Hooker III, R. Charles Henn Jr. of Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
Defendant:     Wolverine World Wide Inc.
Cause:    Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, State Trademark Dilution, Injury to Business Reputation
Court:    Oregon District Court
Judge:     Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel, Judge Marco A. Hernandez

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Adidas America v. World Industries

16 Wednesday May 2012

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Dennis J. Hubel, Federal Trademark Dilution, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Injury to Business Reputation, Paul Papak, State Trademark Dilution, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Unfair Competition

Adidas America, Inc et al v. World Industries, Inc. et al

Court Case Number:    3:12-cv-00859-PK
File Date:    Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Plaintiff:     Adidas America, Inc, adidas AG
Plaintiff Counsel:     Stephen M. Feldman of Perkins Coie LLP
Defendant:     World Industries, Inc., Big 5 Sporting Goods Corporation
Cause:    Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, State Trademark Dilution, Injury to Business Reputation
Court:    Oregon District Court
Judge:     Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel, Magistrate Judge Paul Papak

View this document on Scribd
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...