• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Tag Archives: Federal Trademark Infringement

Wholesale Garden Supply Manufacturer Sues Competitor for Trademark Infringement, Unlawful Trade Practices

22 Tuesday Nov 2016

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Federal Trademark Infringement, Michael H. Simon, Trade Practices, Unlawful Business

Plaintiff Sunlight Supply, Inc., based in Vancouver, Washington, sells products for indoor, hydroponic, organic and greenhouse gardening. Plaintiff is a wholesale-only business, selling its products exclusively through authorized retail dealers.

Defendant has allegedly violated Plaintiff’s trademarks rights in its TITAN, GROW WITH US and WHEN YOU’RE GARDENING WITH THE GODS, THING JUST GROW BETTER! registered trademarks.

screen-shot-2016-12-05-at-1-45-54-pm

Sunlight Supply, Inc. v. Cirrus Systems, Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:16-cv-02201
File Date: Monday, November 21, 2016
Plaintiff: Sunlight Supply, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: David P. Cooper, Owen W. Dukelow, Desmond J. Kidney of Kolisch Hartwell, P.C.
Defendant: Cirrus Systems, Inc.
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Unlawful Business, Trade Practices
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Michael H. Simon

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

Yarn company sues to enforce Twisted trademark

27 Monday Jun 2016

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Infringement, Oregon, State Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

The Plaintiff, based in Portland, Oregon, sells knitting, crochet, spinning, and weaving supplies using the trade name Twisted.

In April 2016, the Plaintiff learned that Defendants, a competitor based in Chelan, Washington, had recently changed their name from “Warehouse Woolery” to “Twisted Fine Yarn & Wool”. The Complaint (below) references several actual instances of confusion.

On June 9, 2016, after receiving Plaintiff’s letters, which put Defendants on notice of Plaintiff’s TWISTED marks and claim of infringement, Defendants filed a federal trademark application for TWISTED FINE YARN & WOOL. That action, unsurprisingly, prompted this trademark lawsuit and likely a trademark opposition. Stay tuned for updates.Screen Shot 2016-06-27 at 6.08.23 PM

Twisted LLC v. 3ZS LLC et al

Court Case Number: 3:16-cv-01259-BR
File Date: Friday, June 24, 2016
Plaintiff: Twisted, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Parna A. Mehrbani of Lane Powell PC
Defendant: 3ZS, LLC d/b/a Twisted Fine Yarn & Wool, Sandi Sandum
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Oregon, State Trademark Infringement, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Anna J. Brown

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

Simple Finance files trademark lawsuit against Simple RTO, alleges website mimicry

10 Tuesday May 2016

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Litigation Update, State Trademark Dilution

This trademark dispute involves the trademarks SIMPLE and SIMPLE FINANCE in connection with financial services.

In addition to using confusingly similar trademarks, the Defendant is also accused of mimicking the design of Plaintiff’s website.

Screen Shot 2016-05-10 at 6.38.44 AM

Simple Finance Technology Corp. v. Simple RTO, LLC

Court Case Number: 3:16-cv-00801-BR
File Date: Monday, May 9, 2016
Plaintiff: Simple Finance Technology Corp.
Plaintiff Counsel: Kristina J. Holm, William C. Rava of Perkins Coie LLP
Defendant: Simple RTO, LLC d/b/a Simple Finance
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, State Dilution
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Anna J. Brown

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

adidas sues Ecco over “Three-Stripe” Trademark

25 Monday Apr 2016

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Adidas, Breach of Contract, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Michael H. Simon, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices

The adidas “Three-Stripe” crusade continues, this time against Ecco Shoes.

Screen Shot 2016-04-25 at 7.48.57 AMClick the Adidas tag on this post for other “Three-Stripe” litigation.

adidas America, Inc. et al v. ECCO USA, Inc. et al

Court Case Number: 3:2016-cv-00684
File Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2016
Plaintiff: adidas America, Inc., adidas AG
Plaintiff Counsel: Daniel P. Larsen of Ater Wynne LLP
Defendant: Ecco USA, Inc., Ecco SKO A/S
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Breach of Contract
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Michael H. Simon

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

Stash Tea Company vs. Stash Cannabis Company…are you confused?

21 Thursday Apr 2016

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, Federal Trademark Infringement, Marco A. Hernandez, Passing Off, State Trademark Dilution, Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices

The Plaintiff, Stash Tea Company, has been in the business of merchandising, supplying and selling high quality tea and tea related products since the early 1970s. They are headquartered in Tigard, Oregon, with a Tea Bar in North Portland. Plaintiff owns several trademark registration for STASH, including the following:

U.S. Reg. No. 4,868,446 for STASH covering “On-line wholesale and retail store services featuring dried plants and tea; Wholesale and retail store services featuring dried plants and tea”

IMG_8773.jpg

Defendant, Stash Cannabis Company, is a marijuana dispensary in Beaverton, Oregon (for those not from Portland, Beaverton and Tigard are really close.) They opened in September 2015.
Screen Shot 2016-04-21 at 7.50.35 AM

Plaintiff has alleged no instances of actual confusion in the Complaint (below) but apparently doesn’t like another STASH nearby.

Does Plaintiff’s trademark registration for “dried plants” extend to marijuana flowers? Keep in mind Plaintiff has never sold marijuana flowers, dry or otherwise. The very broad and somewhat vague “dried plants” description was not challenged by a USPTO Examining Attorney but could leave the relatively new registration open to reexamination or cancellation.

Stay tuned for updates.

Universal Tea Company, Inc., dba Stash Tea Company v. Stash Cannabis Company, LLC et al

Court Case Number: 3:16-cv-00685
File Date: Wednesday, April 20, 2016
Plaintiff: Universal Tea Company, Inc. d/b/a Stash Tea Company
Plaintiff Counsel: Susan D. Pitchford, Amelia S. Forsberg of Chernoff Vilhauer LLP
Defendant: Stash Cannabis Company, LLC, Chris Matthews
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Passing Off, Federal Trademark Dilution, State Trademark Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices
Judge: Marco A. Hernandez

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

Virtual Concierge App Concierge ToGo involved in trademark lawsuit against Conciergo

28 Monday Mar 2016

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Infringement, Litigation Update, Michael H. Simon, Unlawful Trade Practices

In addition to using an allegedly confusingly similar trademark (Plaintiff’s “Concierge ToGo®” vs. Defendant’s “Conciergo“), Defendant is also alleged to have passed itself off to one of Plaintiff’s hotel clients as having an affiliation with Plaintiff.

Both parties provide virtual concierge services, allowing hotel guests to tour their hotel, discover hotel amenities, contact guest services, and obtain information on local attractions and restaurants.

Screen Shot 2016-03-28 at 6.58.41 AM

S&B Associates, Inc. v. Guest Impressions, Inc.

Court Case Number:3:16-cv-00519
File Date: Friday, March 25, 2016
Plaintiff: S&B Associates. Inc. d/b/a HospitalityVision
Plaintiff Counsel: Scott D. Eads of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C.
Defendant: Guest Impressions, Inc.
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Unlawful Trade Practices, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Michael H. Simon

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

Portland’s new “Pelican’s Waiting Room” sued for Trademark Infringement on First Day of Business

23 Wednesday Mar 2016

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, Beer, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition

Less than a week into operation and already facing a trademark lawsuit…ouch. I’d revert to the IP attorney’s old adage of “Always do a proper trademark clearance search” but I’m not sure that was even necessary here. The Plaintiff in this trademark lawsuit is the well-known Pelican Brewing Company, set in beautiful Pacific City, Oregon.

14 - 1

Defendants are alleged to have (recently…Soft Opening was March 19 and Grand Opening is today) infringed upon Plaintiff’s numerous PELICAN-formative marks by opening a bar and restaurant in Portland, Oregon (near NW 23rd, in the home of the recently closed Peddler and Pen) that serves beer, coffee, and foods under the name “Pelican’s Waiting Room.” Defendants also allegedly use a “confusingly similar” logo, as well as food and beverages branded “Pelican” including an alcoholic beverage called “Pelican’s Punch.”

Plaintiff has numerous federal registrations for PELICAN-formative marks. A few weeks ago, Plaintiff was contacted by the director of the Oregon Brewers Guild, who indicated that people in the beer and restaurant industries may be experiencing and/or may be likely to experience confusion between Plaintiff’s PELICAN Marks and Defendants’ use of the Infringing Mark.

Note that the Defendants’ website has already removed the term “Pelican” and now just calls the restaurant “The Waiting Room” so this lawsuit could be resolved quickly.

For Pelican beer aficionados, here’s some good information from the Complaint:

[Plaintiff] is opening the Pelican Brewing Pub in Cannon Beach, Oregon in late Spring 2016. Plaintiff also has plans to open a PELICAN-branded bar and restaurant in Portland, Oregon.

Screen Shot 2016-03-23 at 9.45.43 AM

Pelican Brewing Company v. Pelican’s Waiting Room, LLC et al

Court Case Number: 3:2016-cv-00486
File Date: Tuesday, March 22, 2016
Plaintiff: Pelican Brewing Company
Plaintiff Counsel: Michael A. Cohen, Nicholas (Nika) F. Aldrich, Jr., Alexandra J. Bodnar of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt
Defendant: Pelican’s Waiting Room, LLC d/b/a Pelican’s Waiting Room, No Comply Food Group, LLC, Kyle Rourke
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Anna J. Brown

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

adidas “Three-Stripe” Trademark enforced against Four-Stripe Footwear

08 Tuesday Mar 2016

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Adidas, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Litigation Update, Marco A. Hernandez, State Trademark Dilution, State Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices

The adidas “Three-Stripe” crusade continues, this time against four stripes…

Screen Shot 2016-03-08 at 10.37.29 AM

 

Click the Adidas tag on this post for other “Three-Stripe” litigation.

adidas America, Inc. et al v. Athletic Propulsion Labs, LLC

Court Case Number: 3:16-cv-00415-HZ
File Date: Monday, March 7, 2016
Plaintiff: adidas America, Inc., adidas AG
Plaintiff Counsel: Stephen M. Feldman of Perkins Coie LLP
Defendant: Athletic Propulsion Labs
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, State Unfair and Deceptive Trade Practices, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal Trademark Dilution, State Trademark Dilution
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Marco A. Hernandez

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Too Marker Products et al v. Peter Pauper Press

03 Thursday Mar 2016

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Federal Trademark Infringement, John V. Acosta, Litigation Update, Unfair Competition

Plaintiff manufactures and sells high-end markers for illustrators and design professionals. Their “COPIC” line of markers have distinctive squarish bodies and distinctive squarish cap-ends, both protected by U.S. trademark registrations.

This lawsuit arises because the configuration of Defendant’s Studio Series markers is alleged to be confusingly similar to the configuration denoted in the trademark registrations and the configuration of Plaintiffs’ markers.

In 2014, Plaintiff filed a similar lawsuit. That case resulted in a settlement agreement and permanent injunction against the defendant.

Registration

Too Marker Products, Inc. et al v. Peter Pauper Press, Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:16-cv-00387-AC
File Date: Tuesday, March 1, 2016
Plaintiff: Too Marker Products, Inc., Imagination International, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Timothy S. DeJong, Jacob S. Gill of Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, P.C.
Defendant: Peter Pauper Press, Inc.
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: John V. Acosta

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – House Spirits Distillery v. Pilot House Spirits

29 Friday Jan 2016

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, Federal Trademark Infringement, Litigation Update

This trademark dispute involves Plaintiff’s registered HOUSE SPIRITS trademark and Defendant’s recently adopted PILOT HOUSE SPIRITS trademark.

Some background on the lawsuit: Astoria Distillery That Just Changed Its Name Gets Sued Over New Name

House Spirits Distillery LLC v. Pilot House Spirits LLC

Court Case Number: 3:16-cv-00141-BR
File Date: Tuesday, January 26, 2016
Plaintiff: House Spirits Distillery LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Steven M. Wilker, Eric Beach of Tonkon Torp LLC
Defendant: Pilot House Spirits LLC
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Anna J. Brown

Complaint:

View this document on Scribd
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...