• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Tag Archives: Common Law Unfair Competition

Oregon Trade Dress Litigation Update – Marmoset v. The Music Bed

25 Tuesday Mar 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Portland, Trade Dress, Trademark

≈ 4 Comments

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Copyright Infringement, Litigation Update, Michael W. Mosman, Trade Dress Infringement, Unfair Competition, Voluntary Dismissal

Plenty of thought, time and expense goes into creating a website. Therefore, it has to be pretty upsetting when a direct competitor rips off the “look and feel” of your site. Marmoset

That’s what Marmoset, a specialized boutique music agency based in Portland, Oregon, alleges of The Music Bed, a similar company in Fort Worth, Texas. Check out comparison images in the Complaint or, better yet, go visit the websites yourself.

What do you think? Are the websites too similar? Confusingly similar?

And remember, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.

Marmoset, LLC v. The Music Bed, LLC

Court Case Number: 3:14-cv-00431-MO
File Date: Monday, March 17, 2014
Plaintiff: Marmoset, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Timothy S. DeJong, Jacob S. Gill of Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Schlachter PC, Charles F. Moore of Alleman Hall McCoy Russell & Tuttle LLP
Defendant: The Music Bed, LLC
Cause: Trade Dress Infringement, Unfair Competition, Copyright Infringement, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Michael W. Mosman

View this document on Scribd

UPDATE 7/7/2014: A Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice was filed in this lawsuit on 6/6/2014. To date, there have been no discernible changes to either website.

View this document on Scribd

Unfair Competition/False Advertising Lawsuit Filed Against Oregon Vitamin-Maker

19 Wednesday Mar 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Unfair Competition, False and Misleading Advertising, Garcinia Cambogia, Litigation Update, Mark D. Clarke, Unfair Competition

Vitamins Online, Inc. v. DavidPaul Doyle

Court Case Number: 1:14-cv-00441
File Date: Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Plaintiff: Vitamins Online, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Jeffrey M. Peterson of Ater Wynne LLP
Defendant: DavidPaul Doyle
Cause: Unfair Competition, False and Misleading Advertising, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke

View this document on Scribd

 

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Raptor Archery v. Robert Maitland

10 Monday Feb 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Janice M. Stewart, Litigation Update

Archery_targetThis is a fairly straightforward trademark dispute over the use of the “RAPTOR” trademark in connection with archery equipment. Plaintiff is based in Hood River, Oregon. Defendant is based in Sparks, Nevada, which is located just east of Reno. Plaintiff has a federal registration since 1998 and has used their RAPTOR ARCHERY mark since 1991.

Raptor Archery, Inc. v. Robert Maitland

Court Case Number: 3:14-cv-00203
File Date: Thursday, February 06, 2014
Plaintiff: Raptor Archery, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: William H. Sumerfield of Phillips Reynier & Sumerfield
Defendant: Robert Maitland
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Competition, Common Law Unfair Competition, Federal False Designation of Origin or Source
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Janice M. Stewart

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Nike v. DBV Distribution

12 Sunday Jan 2014

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Cancellation of Trademarks, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Litigation Update, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Nike, Inc. v. DBV Distribution, Inc. et al

Court Case Number: 3:14-cv-00040-ST
File Date: Wednesday, January 08, 2014
Plaintiff: Nike, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Jon P. Stride of Tonkon Torp LLP
Defendant: DBV Distribution, Inc., Dragon Bleu, Sarl
Cause: Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Cancellation of Trademarks
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Janice M. Stewart

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – AXTS v. Arms Unlimited

27 Wednesday Nov 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ann L. Aiken, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Litigation Update, Oregon Unfair Trade Practices Act, Trademark Counterfeiting, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Plaintiff AXTS is an Oregon corporation based in Salem, Oregon. AXTS designs, manufactures, and sells firearm accessories, including the RAPTOR charging handle at issue in this litigation. Plaintiff Rainer Arms is a Washington-based company that co-brands the RAPTOR charging handle.

Defendant Arms Unlimited has allegedly sold counterfeit RAPTOR charging handles on eBay, Amazon and its own website. This lawsuit was brought against Arms Unlimited and its individual owners.

Stay tuned for updates.

FYI, a charging handle (see image below) is a device on a firearm which, when operated, results in the hammer or striker being cocked or moved to the ready position. The devices can vary significantly between firearms.

Charging Handle

AXTS Inc. et al v. Arms Unlimited Inc. et al

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-02100-AA
File Date: Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Plaintiff: AXTS Inc., Rainier Arms, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Jon P. Stride, David M. Weiler of Tonkon Torp LLP
Defendant: Arms Unlimited Inc., Daniel Shamie, Josh Salama
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Trademark Counterfeiting, Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Oregon Unfair Trade Practices Act, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Idylwilde v. Umpqua Feather Merchants

13 Wednesday Nov 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trade Dress, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Conversion, Federal False Designation of Origin, Federal Unfair Competition, Intentional Interference with Contracts and Prospective Economic Advantage, Litigation Update, Marco A. Hernandez, Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, Trade Dress Infringement, Trademark and Trade Dress Dilution, Unjust Enrichment

Portland-based Idylwilde designs, manufactures, markets, brands, and sells flies for the global fly fishing industry. According to the Complaint, “Idylwilde sells to a very sophisticated buyer of flies where the stylized portrayal of insect species, sex, and maturity level of the hatch make a difference the customer is willing to pay for based on the fly designer’s style.”

The Complaint is long but it has a little bit of everything so it’s worth a read. This will be an interesting case to monitor.

Idylwilde, Inc. et al v. Umpqua Feather Merchants, LLC et al

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-02009-HZ
File Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Plaintiff: Idylwilde, Inc., Zach Mertens
Plaintiff Counsel: Katherine R. Heekin of The Heekin Law Firm
Defendant: Umpqua Feather Merchants, LLC, Mirabel, Inc., Bien Tan, Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause: Trade Dress Infringement, Federal False Designation of Origin, and Unfair Competition, Trademark and Trade Dress Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Misappropriation of Trade Secrets, Intentional Interference with Contracts and Prospective Economic Advantage, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Conversion, Unjust Enrichment, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Marco A. Hernandez

View this document on Scribd

 

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Pacific Cargo Control v. Quality Chain Corporation

02 Wednesday Oct 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Infringement, Michael W. Mosman, Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices

Pacific Cargo Control, Inc. v. Quality Chain Corporation

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01750-MO
File Date: Tuesday, October 01, 2013
Plaintiff: Pacific Cargo Control, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Hillary A. Brooks, Delfina S. Homen of Marger Johnson & McCollom, PC
Defendant: Quality Chain Corporation
Cause: Federal Trademark Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Michael W. Mosman

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Coast Distribution System v. Buyers Products Company

25 Wednesday Sep 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Copyright Infringement, Functionality, Litigation Update, Marco A. Hernandez, Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition

The Coast Distribution System Inc. v. Buyers Products Company

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01699-HZ
File Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2013
Plaintiff: The Coast Distribution System Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Charles H. DeVoe, David C. Bourgeau, III, Thomas James Romano of Kolish Hartwell, PC
Defendant: Buyers Products Company
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Marco A. Hernandez

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Nationwide Process Service v. Nationwide Legal

27 Tuesday Aug 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Litigation Update, Marco A. Hernandez, State Trademark Dilution, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Nationwide Process Service, Inc. v. Nationwide Legal, LLC.

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01500-HZ
File Date: Monday, August 26, 2013
Plaintiff: Nationwide Process Service, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Brad C. Stanford, Patricia A. Walsh of Fairleigh Wada Witt PC
Defendant: Nationwide Legal, LLC.
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Trademark Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Unfair Competition
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Marco A. Hernandez

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – City of Portland v. Romtec

20 Tuesday Aug 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Portland

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Common Law Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Copyright Infringement, False Designation of Origin, Federal Trademark Dilution, Litigation Update, Michael W. Mosman, Oregon Uniform Trade Practices Act, Trade Dress Infringement, Unfair Competition

Portland Loo v. Sidewalk ToiletThe first Portland Loo was installed on December 8, 2008, “to enormous media attention.” Portland has used the Loo to capitalize on its reputation as a “green” innovator and has sold the Loo to various municipalities including: Ketchikan Gateway Borough, Alaska, and Victoria and Nanaimo in British Columbia, Canada. The City is currently negotiating to sell Portland Loos to Esquimalt, British Columbia, San Diego, California, and Seattle, Washington.

In January 2013, Portland city officials were informed by an official with the City of Cincinnati, that Defendant Romtec was manufacturing and marketing for sale a restroom substantially and strikingly similar to the Portland Loo called the “Sidewalk Restroom.” Romtec first introduced its Sidewalk Restroom in late 2012.

Portland alleges that Romtec’s Sidewalk Restroom is “substantially and strikingly similar to the distinctive Portland Loo in its total overall expression, appearance, configuration, size, description, and promotion and features key elements that appear to have been copied from the Protected Work including, but not limited to: (a) the placement, size, position, and dimensions of its louvers; (b) the choice of metal wall panels; (c) use of an anti-graffiti powder coating; (d) the stripped down plumbing that facilitates its set-in-place installation; (e) placement of the sink on the exterior of the unit; and (f) dedicated space for art and advertising.”

This lawsuit was brought by Portland to prevent the sale of the Sidewalk Restroom. More background is included in the Complaint (below). Stay tuned for updates.

City of Portland Oregon v. Romtec, Inc.

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-01453-MO
File Date: Monday, August 19, 2013
Plaintiff: City of Portland Oregon
Plaintiff Counsel: Lisa M. Gramp – Attorney at Law
Defendant: Romtec, Inc.
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Trade Dress Infringement, Unfair Competition, False Designation of Origin, Dilution, Common Law Trademark Infringement, Common Law Unfair Competition, Common Law Dilution, Oregon Uniform Trade Practices Act
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Michael W. Mosman

View this document on Scribd
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...