• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Litigation

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Metal-Tech Cage v. John Sundquist

18 Friday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, Kevin M. Hayes, Metal-Tech Cage, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Metal-Tech Cage v. John Sundquist

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01394-BR
File Date: Thursday, November 17, 2011
Plaintiff: Metal-Tech Cage, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Kevin M. Hayes of Klarquist Sparkman, LLP
Defendant: John Sundquist
Cause: Unfair Competition, Trademark Infringement
Court: District Court of Oregon
Judge: Judge Anna J. Brown

View this document on Scribd

Stories from the Week that Was – 11/6-11/12/11

13 Sunday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Litigation, Privacy, Social Media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Facebook, Spotify

Stories from the Week that Was – 11/6-11/12/11

Don’t Believe Facebook, Spotify’s The Only Open Graph Music App Winning

Two-thirds support social networking blackout in future riots

Facebook nears settlement with FTC on privacy

Social Media Impact by Nonprofit Issues [Infographic]

Six-year project to tweet the Second World War

“If it keeps up, man will atrophy all his limbs but the push-button finger.” – Frank Lloyd Wright

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Legacy Health v. Legacy Health Group

13 Sunday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Portland, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, False Advertising, State Trademark Dilution, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Washington Consumer Protection Act

Legacy Health v. Legacy Health Group, LLC et al

Legacy Health, an Oregon nonprofit corporation (Plaintiff), has been a high-quality provider of medical services in the Portland area for over two decades. In this case, they hope to prevent the defendants, a Utah-based LLC and related parties, from using the LEGACY mark in connection with homeopathic diet products.

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01327-BR
File Date: Friday, November 04, 2011
Plaintiff: Legacy Health
Plaintiff Counsel: Randolph C. Foster, Steven E. Klein of Stoel Rives LLP
Defendant: Legacy Health Group, LLC; Charlie Wayne Estes; DOES 1 through 25
Cause: Trademark Infringement; False Advertising and Unfair Competition; Cyberpiracy; Violation of Washington Consumer Protection Act
Court: District Court of Oregon
Judge: Judge Anna J. Brown

View this document on Scribd

Portland Bike Company Faces Trademark Fight

11 Friday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Portland, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

BikePortland, Sprout Cycles

BikePortland has a post about Sprout Cycles, a small (one-man) Portland-based bike manufacturer that has seen another company, Swobo of Fort Collins, Colorado, file a federal trademark application for the SPROUT trademark. Now Sprout Cycles is worried that it willl lose the mark to the bigger company. Check out the full story at BikePortland.org. There’s an interesting discussion brewing in the comment section.

Edwin Brown, Sprout Cycles

Edwin’s situation unfortunately isn’t uncommon and should serve as a valuable lesson to small businesses not to overlook protection of their trademarks. Ignoring your trademarks will only make resolving such issues more difficult (and expensive) when they do arise.

Edwin isn’t completely out of luck here. He can file his own use-based federal application with a date of first use that precedes the Colorado company by over half a decade. He can also oppose the current application during its publication phase. While trademark oppositions can be expensive, there’s already one Portland lawyer who’s offered to provide pro bono assistance. Further, even if the Colorado company receives a federal registration for SPROUT, Edwin can continue to use the mark in the geographic area he’s already serving (presumably Oregon or the Pacific Northwest). It would limit Edwin’s expansion dreams but it doesn’t mean he has to drop the mark completely.

Stories from the Week that Was – 10/30-11/5/11

06 Sunday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Privacy, Social Media, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Apple, Occupy Wall Street

Stories from the Week that Was – 10/30-11/5/11

Protecting Your Online Reputation: 4 Things You Need to Know

Major Book Publisher Files Mass-BitTorrent Lawsuit

Occupy Wall Street applies for trademark

Just how big is 7 billion?

People Who Use Macs At Work Are Richer And More Productive


– WIPO IP Facts and Figures 2011

Important Oregon Caselaw – Oregon State University Alumni Ass’n, Inc. v. Commissioner

06 Sunday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ninth Circuit, Oregon State

In Oregon State University Alumni Ass’n, Inc. v. Commissioner, 193 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 1999), the Ninth Circuit ruled that funds received from affinity credit cards fell within the royalties exclusion from unrelated business income.

The Tax Court concluded that the bank paid the alumni associations for the use of their property rights, not for their services. The credit cards used pictures, colors, words and seals to show the university affiliations…The Tax Court’s findings, that the alumni associations’ promotional activities pursuant to the agreement were de minimis, were well supported. They were not required to mail anything to their members, and merely approved what the bank mailed out in their name once a year. The alumni associations did one mailing during the years at issue, but the agreement did not require it and the bank paid for it separately from the royalties. The Tax Court found that the few telephone responses to members regarding the credit cards were “de minimis and were done to protect petitioner’s goodwill with its members,” a finding well supported in the record. The facts stipulated to and found show that the bank designed the program, promoted it, and maintained it, with de minimis effort from the schools. What little the schools did pursuant to the agreements was the minimal administrative work necessary to give their mailing lists to the bank, and to prevent the bank from promoting the cards in such a way as to sour the associations’ relations with their alumni.

Nonprofits, if you have an affinity credit card program, have you checked that it meets all requirements to fall within the royalties exclusion from unrelated business income? Failure to comply can have significant tax ramifications.

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Danger Ninja Productions v. Estee Lauder

04 Friday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Portland

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Copyright Misattribution, DMCA Violation, Kurt M. Rylander, Mark E. Beatty, Paul Papak, Photography, Unfair Trade Practices

Danger Ninja Productions et al v. Estee Lauder Companies, Inc. et al

Plaintiff, a Portland-based photographer, alleges that cosmetic giant Estee Lauder used one of his images (DRIPPING BLACK…see below) without authorization on magazine covers and in connection with in-store campaigns.

Can you spot Daniel Hoyt’s image in the MAC ad below?

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01321-PK
File Date: Thursday, November 03, 2011
Plaintiff: Danger Ninja Productions, Daniel Hoyt
Plaintiff Counsel: Kurt M. Rylander, Mark E. Beatty of Rylander & Associates PC
Defendant: Estee Lauder Companies, Inc.
Make-Up Art Cosmetics, Inc.
M.A.C. Cosmetics, Inc.
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Copyright Misattribution, DMCA Violation, Unfair Trade Practices
Court: District Court of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Paul Papak

View this document on Scribd

Related story: Evelyn Lauder dead at 75

Death by 1000 Patent Lawsuits: Amazon Sued Again

28 Friday Oct 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Patent

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Amazon

Amazon.com, the world’s biggest online retailer, was hit with more intellectual property lawsuits in the third quarter.

In its quarterly earnings report filed yesterday with the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission, Amazon, No. 1 in the Internet Retailer Top 500 Guide, revealed that the company is now battling 18 separate intellectual property lawsuits, including eight filed in September. Among those is a case filed in Oregon District Court…Select Retrieval Inc. filed a lawsuit for infringement of a patent for data display software with actions and links that are integrated with various types of data.

Amazon is going to have to do some serious sales this holiday season to cover those legal fees. Ouch.

See Internet Retailer for more info and full list of lawsuits.

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC v. Bibiji Inderjit Kaur Puri

14 Friday Oct 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Declaratory Judgment as to Damages, Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement

Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC v. Bibiji Inderjit Kaur Puri

Plaintiff Hearthside Food Solutions, the “largest privately-owned bakery in the United States,” has turned to the Oregon federal judiciary for assistance in sorting out a trademark dispute with the widow of Yogi Bhajan. Facing accusations of infringement from the widow and unable to successfully negotiate an amicable compromise, Plaintiff has filed for a Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement for their PEACE CEREAL, GOLDEN TEMPLE and YOGI marks.

We’ll have to wait for Defendant’s Answer/Counterclaims for more information but this case probably arises from the larger dispute over “The Fight For Yogi Bhajan’s Empire.”  Marketing moves quicker than legal it seems as Plaintiff has already moved to rebrand its Yogi brand products:

The full Complaint is below. Stay tuned to the Oregon Intellectual Property Law Blog for updates as the case proceeds.

“If you want to learn something, read about it.
If you want to understand something, write about it.
If you want to master something, teach it.” Yogi Bhajan

Court Case Number:    3:11-cv-01238-HU
File Date:    Thursday, October 13, 2011
Plaintiff:     Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel:     Kenneth R. Davis, II, Parna A. Mehrbani of Lane Powell, PC
Defendant:     Bibiji Inderjit Kaur Puri
Cause:     Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the Peace Mark; Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the Golden Temple Mark; Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement of the Yogi Mark
Court:    Oregon District Court
Judge:     Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Hearthside Food Solutions v. Bibiji Inderjit Kaur Puri

14 Friday Oct 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement, Dennis J. Hubel, Kenneth R. Davis, Parna A. Mehrbani, Trademark Infringement

Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC v. Bibiji Inderjit Kaur Puri

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01238-HU
File Date: Thursday, October 13, 2011
Plaintiff: Hearthside Food Solutions, LLC                                                                   Plaintiff Counsel: Kenneth R. Davis, II, Parna A. Mehrbani of Lane Powell, PC
Defendant: Bibiji Inderjit Kaur Puri
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Declaratory Judgment of Non-Infringement
Court: District Court of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel

View this document on Scribd
← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...