• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Category Archives: Copyright

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Voltage Pictures v. Doe IP 76.115.46.230

20 Monday May 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, BitTorrent, Copyright Infringement, Voltage Pictures

Apparently undaunted by the previous mass dismissals, Voltage Pictures has moved forward with their BitTorrent litigation strategy by filing a copyright infringement action against a single IP address. I’m reluctant to forecast Voltage Pictures’ next move, but I suspect this is a test case that, if financially successful, will result in hundreds of individual filings.

[Update: A commenter has informed that the Defendant in this case was one of the first to respond with a Motion to Quash in one of the original Voltage Pictures cases, 3:13-cv-00295-AC. The Defendant, represented by Swider Medeiros Haver LLP, was released from that case as a part of the mass dismissals undertaken last week by Judge Aiken.]

Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Doe IP 76.115.46.230

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00836-BR
File Date: Friday, May 17, 2013
Plaintiff: Voltage Pictures, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell, Jonathan T. van Heel of Crowell Law
Defendant: Doe IP 76.115.46.230
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
Judge: Judge Anna J. Brown

View this document on Scribd

See other Oregon Download Cases.

Voltage Pictures Lawsuits DISMISSED

13 Monday May 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Portland

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ann L. Aiken, BitTorrent, Contributory Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright

For all but the one unlucky individual designated as Doe #1 in each case, the Voltage Pictures BitTorrent download cases have been dismissed. Voltage Pictures is permitted to refile against each of the defendants individually, but will now be required to pay the $400 court filing fee for each defendant rather than one lump payment. The Oregonian does some nice reporting on the dismissal.

Here is the full Order of Dismissal. It’s worth a read.

View this document on Scribd

 

It’s doubtful that this is the last Oregon will see of these BitTorrent cases so stay tuned for updates.

Voltage Pictures hits a roadblock in Ohio court

08 Monday Apr 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Voltage Pictures

Voltage Pictures, the Plaintiff in several Oregon download cases, has met a roadblock in Ohio federal court in the form of Judge James S. Gwin. Judge Gwin ordered, sua sponte, that Voltage Pictures had improperly joined hundreds of Defendants. The Judge has severed the cases, requiring Voltage to pay appropriate filing fees in order to continue. Here are some highlights and the full Opinion & Order is below:

Because IP addresses are the only identifiers of peers within a BitTorrent system, it is difficult, if not impossible, to learn the true identities of the peers in a swarm.21 To pursue litigation, plaintiffs in BitTorrent suits must attempt to get early discovery to learn of the actual identities of the unnamed defendants.22 The requests have been the subject of much criticism, for the lawsuits are rarely litigated. Rather, plaintiffs seek to take advantage of the resources of federal courts to force small, individual settlements.23

Courts have been troubled by what amounts to be a new business model employed by production companies “misusing the subpoena powers of the court, seeking the identities of the Doe defendants solely to facilitate demand letters and  coerce settlement, rather than ultimately serve process and litigate the claims.”41 This unseemly practice is made worse by the frequent practice of joining hundreds or thousands of defendants in a suit, saving plaintiffs tens of thousands of dollars in filing fees. It is in this environment where courts must take every caution to ensure that the keys to the doors of discovery are not blithely given to parties with other intentions.

Regardless of the dubious practices of others, Plaintiffs may have legitimate claims which deserve litigation. Nevertheless, unnamed Defendants are improperly joined, and in order to continue with their actions, Plaintiffs will need to pay the requisite filing fee per suit.42 Otherwise, Plaintiff has saved over $67,500 by consolidating its claims into four separate actions. If Plaintiffs seek to use the powers of this Court to vindicate its rights, it must pay the requisite fees like every other Plaintiff.

Time will tell if Oregon will make a similar ruling, which essentially shifts some of the financial burden for these download cases from the taxpayer to the Plaintiff.

Opinion & Order, James S. Gwin, United States District Judge:

View this document on Scribd

This is how the download cases would be resolved by Don Draper

03 Wednesday Apr 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Litigation, Oregon, Privacy

≈ Leave a comment

Check out an Answer filed in one of the Oregon download cases:

Screen Shot 2013-04-03 at 9.41.40 AMRemember a time when a concerned father and business owner could talk over and settle a dispute involving a teen son “shoplifting”? The question the rest of us should be asking is whether U.S. federal courts are the ideal place to have those conversations? Keep in mind that the administrative expense of these “collections” lawsuits falls largely on the taxpayer.

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – RynoRyder Productions v. Does 1-23

29 Friday Mar 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Copyright Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright, Litigation Update, Thomas M. Coffin

RynoRyder Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-23

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00539-TC
File Date: Thursday, March 28, 2013
Plaintiff: RynoRyder Productions, Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell, Jonathan T. van Heel of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1-23
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin

View this document on Scribd

 

See other Oregon Download Cases.

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Penguin Group v. American Buddha

23 Saturday Mar 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Copyright Infringement, Dennis J. Hubel, Litigation Update

New York-based publisher Penguin Group’s battle against Oregon-based nonprofit American Buddha continues in Oregon after being dismissed in New York for lack of personal jurisdiction. American Buddha has uploaded complete copies of books and other media onto American Buddha’s online library that is accessible by some 50,000 members at no charge. Four of the books posted belong to mega-publisher Penguin, which claims copyright infringement. American Buddha claims (in the American Buddha Online Library Copyright Notice) to be operating safely under 17 U.S.C. Section 108, which exempts libraries and archives from liability for creating reproductions (under certain conditions). It seems a stretch to apply Section 108 to PDFs posted on a website but American Buddha claims to impose “contractual and technical limitations on access to the archive” that could potentially bring it within the contours of 108. “Library” isn’t defined in the Copyright Act but the context of 108 suggests it be interpreted in the traditional manner, as a real, physical location, not an online repository. It seems yet another part of the Copyright Act that might need clarification in the digital age. Stay tuned as the parties sort it out.

Penguin Group(USA) Inc. v. American Buddha

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00497-HU
File Date: Friday, March 22, 2013
Plaintiff: Penguin Group(USA) Inc.
Plaintiff Counsel: Duane A. Bosworth, II, Timothy M. Cunningham of Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP
Defendant: American Buddha
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Dennis J. Hubel

View this document on Scribd

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – The Thompsons Film v. Does 1-155

20 Wednesday Mar 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Copyright Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright, Litigation Update, Thomas M. Coffin

The Thompsons Film, LLC v. Does 1-155

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00469-TC
File Date: Tuesday, March 19, 2013
Plaintiff: The Thompsons Film, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell, Jonathan T. van Heel of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1-155
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin

View this document on Scribd

 

See other Oregon Download Cases.

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 16

27 Wednesday Feb 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Copyright Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright, Litigation Update, Mark D. Clarke

Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 16

Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00333-CL
File Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Plaintiff: Elf-Man, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1 – 16
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke

View this document on Scribd

 

See other Oregon Download Cases.

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 57

27 Wednesday Feb 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Copyright Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright, Litigation Update, Thomas M. Coffin

Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1 – 57

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00331-TC
File Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Plaintiff: Elf-Man, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1 – 57
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin

View this document on Scribd

 

See other Oregon Download Cases.

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1-107

26 Tuesday Feb 2013

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Contributory Copyright Infringement, Copyright Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright, John V. Acosta, Litigation Update

Elf-Man, LLC v. Does 1-107

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00334-AC
File Date: Tuesday, February 26, 2013
Plaintiff: Elf-Man, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1-107
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta

View this document on Scribd

 

See other Oregon Download Cases.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...