• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Author Archives: Kenan Farrell

Stories from the Week that Was – 11/13-11/19/11

20 Sunday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Copyright, Intellectual Property, Legislation, Litigation, Privacy, Social Media

≈ Leave a comment

Stories from the Week that Was – 11/13-11/19/11

Press Russia on intellectual property: US lawmakers

Criminal Case Glut Impedes Civil Suits

Picking Brand Names in China Is a Business Itself

The Entrepreneurial Generation

The NLRB’s Obsession with Social Media Continues

Viacom so devastated by piracy that CEO gets $50 million raise

Woman decapitated after anti-crime blog, police say

Attorneys seek to auction Righthaven copyrights

Artists Sue CBS, CNET, for Promoting and Profiting from Piracy

SOPA and Protect IP: What Legal Nightmares Are Made of

Number of 90-plus people likely to quadruple by 2050

Are Digital Resale Markets Legal? Should They Be?

“Humanity is acquiring all the right technology for all the wrong reasons.” -R. Buckminster Fuller

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Metal-Tech Cage v. John Sundquist

18 Friday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, Kevin M. Hayes, Metal-Tech Cage, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition

Metal-Tech Cage v. John Sundquist

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01394-BR
File Date: Thursday, November 17, 2011
Plaintiff: Metal-Tech Cage, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Kevin M. Hayes of Klarquist Sparkman, LLP
Defendant: John Sundquist
Cause: Unfair Competition, Trademark Infringement
Court: District Court of Oregon
Judge: Judge Anna J. Brown

View this document on Scribd

Occupy Entrepreneurs Learn Trademark Law

15 Tuesday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Oregon, Portland, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Occupy Portland

An increasing number of entrepreneurs are figuring out how to profit from the Occupy movement. “Occupy” trademarks are all the rage and “We are the 99%” t-shirts are a popular item. There’s no application yet for Occupy Portland, but check out this recent filing from Wisconsin (filed October 29, 2011):

Quite a mouthful, huh? And what’s the hashtag???

Never one to shy away from a quick buck, rapper Jay-Z (“I’m not a businessman, I’m a business, man) tried to use an evening among the Occupy movement to hawk his own line of “Occupy All Streets” t-shirts. Backlash was quick and widespread once it became clear that none of the profits would help the Occupy movement.

Have you bought any Occupy-related merchandise yet?

Walter Lichtenberg sits on a park bench selling shirts and buttons at the Occupy Portland camp in October in downtown Portland, Ore. Enterprising silk-screeners and others are seeking to profit from the nationwide Occupy movements. / Don Ryan / File / Associated Press

Full Story

Stories from the Week that Was – 11/6-11/12/11

13 Sunday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Litigation, Privacy, Social Media

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Facebook, Spotify

Stories from the Week that Was – 11/6-11/12/11

Don’t Believe Facebook, Spotify’s The Only Open Graph Music App Winning

Two-thirds support social networking blackout in future riots

Facebook nears settlement with FTC on privacy

Social Media Impact by Nonprofit Issues [Infographic]

Six-year project to tweet the Second World War

“If it keeps up, man will atrophy all his limbs but the push-button finger.” – Frank Lloyd Wright

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Legacy Health v. Legacy Health Group

13 Sunday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Portland, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Anna J. Brown, False Advertising, State Trademark Dilution, Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Washington Consumer Protection Act

Legacy Health v. Legacy Health Group, LLC et al

Legacy Health, an Oregon nonprofit corporation (Plaintiff), has been a high-quality provider of medical services in the Portland area for over two decades. In this case, they hope to prevent the defendants, a Utah-based LLC and related parties, from using the LEGACY mark in connection with homeopathic diet products.

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01327-BR
File Date: Friday, November 04, 2011
Plaintiff: Legacy Health
Plaintiff Counsel: Randolph C. Foster, Steven E. Klein of Stoel Rives LLP
Defendant: Legacy Health Group, LLC; Charlie Wayne Estes; DOES 1 through 25
Cause: Trademark Infringement; False Advertising and Unfair Competition; Cyberpiracy; Violation of Washington Consumer Protection Act
Court: District Court of Oregon
Judge: Judge Anna J. Brown

View this document on Scribd

Portland Bike Company Faces Trademark Fight

11 Friday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Portland, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

BikePortland, Sprout Cycles

BikePortland has a post about Sprout Cycles, a small (one-man) Portland-based bike manufacturer that has seen another company, Swobo of Fort Collins, Colorado, file a federal trademark application for the SPROUT trademark. Now Sprout Cycles is worried that it willl lose the mark to the bigger company. Check out the full story at BikePortland.org. There’s an interesting discussion brewing in the comment section.

Edwin Brown, Sprout Cycles

Edwin’s situation unfortunately isn’t uncommon and should serve as a valuable lesson to small businesses not to overlook protection of their trademarks. Ignoring your trademarks will only make resolving such issues more difficult (and expensive) when they do arise.

Edwin isn’t completely out of luck here. He can file his own use-based federal application with a date of first use that precedes the Colorado company by over half a decade. He can also oppose the current application during its publication phase. While trademark oppositions can be expensive, there’s already one Portland lawyer who’s offered to provide pro bono assistance. Further, even if the Colorado company receives a federal registration for SPROUT, Edwin can continue to use the mark in the geographic area he’s already serving (presumably Oregon or the Pacific Northwest). It would limit Edwin’s expansion dreams but it doesn’t mean he has to drop the mark completely.

Digimarc Ranked Among Top Information Technology Leaders

10 Thursday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Oregon, Patent

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Digimarc, Information Technology, Wall Street Journal

Congrats go out to Beaverton, Oregon-based Digimarc Corporation, which recently entered the top 10 of The Wall Street Journal’s Patent Scorecard of leading innovators in the information technology industry.

Ranked at #9 overall, Digimarc has the highest Industry Impact score in the top 50. According to The Wall Street Journal, Industry Impact indicates the extent to which others are building upon a portfolio of issued US utility patents as compared to the total set of utility patents in the industry. As the chart below indicates, Digimarc maintains far less patents than most companies on the list, but those patents they do hold are extremely valuable.

Digimarc is a leading innovator and provider of enabling technologies that create digital identities for all forms of media and many everyday objects. Digimarc has built an extensive intellectual property portfolio with patents in digital watermarking, content identification and management, media and object discovery to enable ubiquitous computing, and related technologies.

Click image for full WSJ Patent Board.

Oregon Companies Win Award to Develop Enhanced Blind and Low Vision Technology for Students

09 Wednesday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Federal Initiatives, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

HumanWare, Independence Science, Vernier, ViewPlus

Oregon-based companies Vernier Software & Technology LLC (Beaverton) and ViewPlus Technologies Inc. (Corvallis) have received a $500,000 SBIR Phase II award from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to develop technology that enhances hands-on science learning for students affected by blindness and low vision.

The companies will use the award to further develop Talking LabQuest, the first portable scientific data collection device equipped with text-to-speech technology to help students in science laboratory classrooms.

Talking LabQuest is being developed in partnership with HumanWare Inc. of Drummondville, Quebec and Independence Science LLC of Indianapolis, Indiana.

For more, see Inside INdiana Business.

Avoiding Loss of Trademark Rights

08 Tuesday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Trademark Infringement, Trademark Rights

trademarkYou’ve spent time, energy and money developing and protecting your trademark…possibly even obtaining a federal trademark registration. Now what? Moving forward, you need to be careful to avoid several pitfalls that can result in the loss of your valuable trademark rights. Set forth below are several important considerations you should think about to avoid losing your rights as you continue to use your trademark and enforce your trademark rights against third parties:

1. Failure to use the trademark. Since trademark rights are based on use, a trademark owner must continue to use the trademark properly in order to avoid forfeiture of rights by abandonment. Non-use occurs when a trademark owner stops using the mark and does not intend to resume use. Further, intention not to resume use may be inferred from a trademark owner’s failure to use the mark for two consecutive years. Once a mark is deemed abandoned, all rights to it are lost.

2. Authorizing uncontrolled use of the trademark. Trademark rights can be lost if you license the trademark to others but don’t take adequate steps to monitor the style and quality of products or services associated with the trademark. After all, trademark law grants you exclusive use of the trademark in exchange for giving the consuming public a reliable indication of quality. If the level of quality falls below a certain level, you may be setting yourself up for cancellation of your trademark right.

3. Failure to enforce your rights against infringers. If you continually allow known infringers to violate your trademark rights, you effectively give up the right to challenge their use. While this might not result in cancellation of your registration, you are undermining your trademark by wilfully adopting a very narrow scope of protection.

4. Generic use. Generic use refers to the situation in which a trademark becomes so familiar that the distinction of the mark diminishes. We’re all familiar with the following trademarks which were allowed to become generic over time: aspirin, escalator, and linoleum. Rights to those trademarks were lost because appropriate steps were not taken to prevent the public from coming to regard the marks as generic products or services, rather than particular brand names.

If you have concerns about whether you are adequately protecting your trademarks, consider consulting a trademark professional who can help you implement procedures for maintaining and enforcing your rights.

Voting by iPad in Oregon on Tuesday

07 Monday Nov 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Apple, iPad

Oregon is set to become the first state to use Apple’s iPad in the voting process.

Tomorrow, election workers are taking iPads to disabled voters who might otherwise have difficulties marking their ballots. These voters are able to pull up the ballot on the iPad and tap the screen to mark the candidate of their choice before printing out their completed ballot and send it in by mail.

Apple donated five iPads to Oregon for the program, and Oregon spent about $75,000 to create the necessary software. Oregon election officials say they are hoping the iPad will totally replace the old handicapped accessible equipment program, which is outdated and difficult to use. Approximately 800 people used that service in 2010.

Read more at Politico.

← Older posts
Newer posts →

Categories

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...