Author Archives: Kenan Farrell

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Pacwest Development, LLC v. Pacwest II, L.L.C.

21 Thursday Feb 2013

Posted by in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Pacwest Development, LLC v. Pacwest II, L.L.C.

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00300-AA
File Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Plaintiff: Pacwest Development, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Todd R. Johnston of Hershner Hunter LLP
Defendant: Pacwest II, L.L.C.
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Federal Unfair Trade Practice, Unfair Trade Practice, Dilution
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1 – 34

20 Wednesday Feb 2013

Posted by in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1 – 34

Court Case Number: 1:13-cv-00293-CL
File Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Plaintiff: Voltage Pictures, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1 – 34
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1 – 12

20 Wednesday Feb 2013

Posted by in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1 – 12

Court Case Number: 2:13-cv-00292-SU
File Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Plaintiff: Voltage Pictures, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1 – 12
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Patricia Sullivan

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1 – 198

20 Wednesday Feb 2013

Posted by in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1 – 198

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00290-AA
File Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Plaintiff: Voltage Pictures, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1 – 198
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright,
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-371

20 Wednesday Feb 2013

Posted by in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , , ,

Voltage Pictures, LLC v. Does 1-371

Court Case Number: 3:13-cv-00295-AC
File Date: Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Plaintiff: Voltage Pictures, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D. Crowell of Crowell Law
Defendant: Does 1-371
Cause: Copyright Infringement, Contributory Infringement, Indirect Infringement of Copyright
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge John V. Acosta

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. The Peacock Bar & Grill East

17 Sunday Feb 2013

Posted by in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. The Peacock Bar & Grill East et al

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00281-TC
File Date: Saturday, February 16, 2013
Plaintiff: Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Franklin J. Seibert of F.J. Seibert LLC
Defendant: The Peacock Bar & Grill East, SKMJMM LLC
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices, Common Law Passing Off
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Frank-N-Steins Pub et al

16 Saturday Feb 2013

Posted by in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Frank-N-Steins Pub et al

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00279-AA
File Date: Friday, February 15, 2013
Plaintiff: Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D Crowell of Crowell Law, Franklin J. Seibert of Franklin Jason Seibert
Defendant: Frank-N-Steins Pub, EET L.L.C.
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices, Common Law Passing Off
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Harrison Bar & Grill

15 Friday Feb 2013

Posted by in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, , , , ,

Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation v. Harrison Bar & Grill et al

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00269-TC
File Date: Thursday, February 14, 2013
Plaintiff: Slep-Tone Entertainment Corporation
Plaintiff Counsel: Carl D Crowell of Crowell Law, Franklin J. Seibert of F.J. Seibert, LLC
Defendant: Harrison Bar & Grill, Yeung’s Investment Inc.
Cause: Trademark Infringement, Unfair Competition, Unlawful Trade Practices, Common Law Passing Off
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Coffin

Oregon Copyright Litigation Update – Laloni Kay Chrisenson v. Campus Crusade for Christ, FLTI

14 Thursday Feb 2013

Posted by in Copyright, District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

, ,

Laloni Kay Chrisenson v. FLTI et al

Court Case Number: 6:13-cv-00254-AA
File Date: Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Plaintiff: Laloni Kay Chrisenson
Plaintiff Counsel: Daniel J. Rice of Heltzel Williams Yandell Roth Smith & Petersen, PC
Defendant: FLTI, Campus Crusade for Christ, Inc.
Cause: Copyright Infringement
Court: Oregon District Court
Judge: Chief Judge Ann L. Aiken

Nike Awarded ‘Nike.Ru’ Domain Name in Russian Trademark Dispute

21 Monday Jan 2013

Posted by in Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

,

Beaverton, Oregon-based Nike, Inc. was awarded the nike.ru domain name by the Moscow Commercial Court, as reported by the Russian Legal Information Agency.

The court ruled that Russian businessman Stas Drugalyov, who registered the nike.ru domain name, hadn’t used it properly. Nike’s attorney, Anton Sergo, stated that Drugalyov has never owned the trademark, adding that the domain does not reflect his or the registrar’s name.

The verdict can be appealed within 30 days. Until that time, Nike will continue using its old URL: www.nike.com/ru/ru_ru.