• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Monthly Archives: August 2009

Oregon Trademark Litigation Update – Relativity Rogue, LLC v. Oregon Brewing Company

25 Tuesday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Litigation, Oregon, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

Case Number: 2:09-cv-05887-GW-VBK
File Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2009
Plaintiff: Relativity Rogue, LLC
Plaintiff Counsel: Anthony M. Keats, David K. Caplan, Konrad K. Gatien of Keats McFarland & Wilson LLP
Defendant: Oregon Brewing Company
Cause: 15:1051 Trademark Infringement
Court: California Central District Court
Judge: Judge George H. Wu
Referred To: Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton

roguestout

A California-based film production company named Relativity Rogue (“Relativity”) has filed an action for declaratory relief against Oregon Brewing Company (“OBC,” a.k.a. the makers of fine Rogue ales).  OBC sent cease & desist letters in June and July, 2009, asserting that Relativity’s use of the term “rogue” in connection with a multi-media ROGUE PICTURES-themed  concert venue called The Rogue Joint in Las Vegas will result in consumer confusion with OBC’s ROGUE trademarks for alcoholic beverages.  Rather than quibble about it, Relativity decided it would just go ahead and have the issue decided by the California Central District Court, filing this Complaint for Declaratory Relief.  Relativity seeks a judgment that it’s use of the term “rogue” in connection with its entertainment-related business activities does not constitute trademark infringement, unfair competition, trademark dilution, or rise to any actionable violation of OBC’s rights in the ROGUE marks.  Way to take the initiative, Relativity!

This quick trigger by Relativity makes me think this is either a part of their settlement strategy or the parties just came to an impasse in negotiations.  Either way, the court will now attempt to settle their rights in the public eye, for better or worse.  I’ll update you as this matter proceeds.

Picture 1

Picture 2

Picture 3

For a copy of the full complaint, please leave a comment with your email.

Green Startup Sues Printing Giant in Oregon District Court

05 Wednesday Aug 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Litigation, Patent, Trade Secret

≈ Leave a comment

greenprojectlogoA local green startup firm has counter-sued a printing giant, claiming that it illegally cracked down on the right to resell its used product.

Hacienda Heights-based Green Project Inc. alleges in a lawsuit filed July 27 in U.S. District Court in Oregon that Epson America Inc. and its parent, Japan-based Seiko Epson Corp., sent a company spy into the Green Project facility to gain access to trade secrets.

The company also claims that Epson punished it and firms like it for reselling recycled Epson cartridges.

Epson, which first filed a lawsuit against Green Project and several other firms in April over alleged patent infringement, denies all charges.

“My reaction (to the allegations) is they are B.S. and designed to create a posture for Green Project … and that there’s no substance to them,” said David W. Axelrod, a lead attorney for Epson. But in its countersuit, Green Project says Epson’s infringement claims don’t stand up against the “first sale doctrine,” a legal approach that says a patent owner’s rights to intellectual property end once a particular product has been sold to the public. Green Project, a company of 13 employees, does business by “re-manufacturing” ink and toner cartridges for use on major manufacturers’ printers, including Epson’s.

The year-old company touts the service as good for the environment, since it takes discarded cartridges and puts them to new use.

“It’s not that we are looking for p.r.,” said Green Project President Joseph Wu. “Our goal is to recycle Epson’s cartridges. If we don’t, they go to landfills. We are recycling and looking to reduce e-waste, but also to make a business.”

EpsonLogoThe company thought it was doing business when Herbert W. Seitz allegedly called – using another name – looking to buy cartridges from Green Project and ultimately sell them at his Huntington Beach firm, Wu said. As part of that business, Green Project sent price lists and other secret information to Seitz, who turned out to be an Epson employee, Wu alleged, adding that within a couple of days, Seitz showed up in the company warehouse without permission.

“The issue is that when Epson did come to us, they came under false pretenses,” Wu said.

Green Project accuses Epson – one of the largest manufacturers of printers – of trade secret misappropriation and trespassing, and denies Epson’s claims of patent infringement.

But Epson’s lawyers maintain they have a case against Green Project.

Axelrod pointed to the “first sale” doctrine, adding that the doctrine of first sale does not apply in this case, because there is evidence the used cartridges were collected out of the U.S. Wu said his firm works with brokers who document that cartridges were collected in the U.S.

Wu’s company is seeking to be dropped from Epson’s original suit, and for Epson to pay damages and legal fees. It’s also looking to stop Epson from using any secrets that Seitz allegedly obtained.

Epson wants the firms named in the lawsuit to pay damages and for its patents to be enforced.

Source: SGVTribune.com

Categories

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...