• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Daily Archives: December 15, 2011

U.S. to fund 46 transportation projects, including Portland’s Sellwood Bridge Replacement

15 Thursday Dec 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Federal Initiatives, Oregon, Portland

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Ray LaHood

U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood announced Thursday that 46 transportation projects in 33 states and Puerto Rico will receive $511 million in the latest round of Transportation Investments Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grants. Multnomah County is among the recipients, for the Sellwood Bridge Replacement project.

Old Sellwood Bridge

The award “will provide the final piece of funding for the complete replacement of the Sellwood Bridge in Portland, OR. The Sellwood Bridge, which was constructed in 1925, is the only crossign over the Willamette River within 12 miles, and is structurally deficient and functionally obsolete. A new two-lane steel arch bridge is being constructed to replace the existing bridge.”

See the Sellwood award below:

View this document on Scribd

 

For more on the other awards, see CNN.com.

Oregon Litigation Update – Tria Beauty v. Oregon Aesthetic Technologies

15 Thursday Dec 2011

Posted by Kenan Farrell in District of Oregon, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Oregon

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

False Advertising, John Jelderks, Oregon Aesthetic Tech, Ropes & Gray, Tria Beauty, Unfair Competition

Tria Beauty v. Oregon Aesthetic Technologies, Inc.

Plaintiff, which manufactures and sells an FDA-approved phototherapy device for the treatment of acne, alleges that Defendant is selling a non-FDA approved phototherapy device for the treatment of acne in violation of various unfair competition and false advertising laws. While there are no trademark or copyright claims in this Complaint, many trademark or copyright cases do include unfair competition claims and so I thought this case could be instructive for readers of the Oregon IP blog. Stay tuned for updates.

Court Case Number: 3:11-cv-01510-JE
File Date: Wednesday, December 14, 2011
Plaintiff: Tria Beauty
Plaintiff Counsel: Thad A. Davis, Alexandra J. Roberts, Joshua V. Van Hoven, Peter M. Brody of Ropes & Gray LLP
Defendant: Oregon Aesthetic Technologies, Inc.
Cause: Unfair Competition, False Advertising
Court: District of Oregon
Judge: Magistrate Judge John Jelderks

View this document on Scribd

Categories

Blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar