• About
  • Contact
  • Disclaimer
  • Oregon IP Resources

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Oregon Intellectual Property Blog

Monthly Archives: July 2009

Oregon Man Sentenced for First-Degree Trademark Counterfeiting

29 Wednesday Jul 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Intellectual Property, Litigation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

OREGON CITY — A Happy Valley man will serve 40 days in jail for selling counterfeit Rolex watches, iPods and designer apparel on the Internet.  Gordon Kean Dye, 52, also will pay a $500 fine, pay for his extradition from Texas and remain on probation for two years after he completes his jail term.

Dye was arrested by FBI agents in September 2008, during a crackdown on intellectual property rights violations. After agents obtained a search warrant, they found Dye with several bogus items he bought in Mexico, including 20 bogus Rolex watches, Coach handbags, Nike apparel and items bearing the prestigious Prada label. The counterfeit goods were manufactured in China.

rolex

Dye faced charges in both Washington and Clackamas counties. Prosecutors in both counties worked together and negotiated coordinated pleas.

On Friday, Dye pleaded guilty in Washington County Circuit Court to second-degree trademark counterfeiting.

Today, he pleaded guilty in Clackamas County Circuit Court to first-degree trademark counterfeiting, second-degree trademark counterfeiting and third-degree trademark counterfeiting.

Dye offered a simple apology to Judge Steven L. Maurer.

“I’m sorry for being here, your honor, in this courtroom,” he said.

Source: The Oregonian

coach-patch-tote

The Trademark Counterfeiting statute appears below.  Click the links above to see the penalty for each degree of counterfeiting.

CHAPTER 647—Trademarks and Service Marks; Oregon Revised Statutes 647.135
(1) A person commits trademark counterfeiting if the person knowingly and with the intent to sell or distribute and without the consent of the registrant uses, displays, advertises, distributes, offers for sale, sells or possesses any item that bears a counterfeit of a mark or any service that is identified by a counterfeit of a mark registered under this chapter or registered under this chapter or registered under 15 U.S.C. 1052 with knowledge that the mark is counterfeit.

(2) For purposes of this section, a mark is counterfeit if:

(a) It is a mark that is identical to or substantially indistinguishable from a registered mark; and

(b) It is used on or in connection with the same type of goods or services for which the genuine mark is registered.

(3) A person does not commit trademark counterfeiting if the person has adopted and lawfully used the same or a confusingly similar mark in the rendition of like services or the manufacture of like goods in this state from a date before the effective date of registration of the service mark or trademark and continues to use the mark after the effective date of registration.

Stay out of trouble, kids!

Oregon Harmonizes State Trademark Law with Federal Law

15 Wednesday Jul 2009

Posted by Kenan Farrell in Legislation, Trademark

≈ Leave a comment

NEW YORK, NY – The International Trademark Association (INTA) announced its support to the state of Oregon as they recently signed into law legislation that harmonizes Oregon trademark law with federal trademark law and reflects principles contained in the Model State Trademark Bill (MSTB) developed by INTA, according to the Association.

“By enacting this legislation, Oregon once again shows its dedication to protecting businesses and consumers by providing assistance and support for growth in this ailing economy. We commend Oregon for taking action and for its leadership to other states as they consider similar laws,” INTA Executive Director Alan Drewsen said.

This legislation will help to stimulate growth of the Oregon economy by ensuring full state trademark protection for businesses.  The new Act prohibits trademark infringement and provides that damages awarded may be three times the injury in a case of bad faith or knowing infringement.

“This new law is the result of businesses and government working together to achieve a long-needed update to Oregon’s trademark statute, and it will benefit both the state’s economy and consumers,” Anne Glazer, a partner in the law firm of Stoel Rives LLP stated.

“Oregonians and others who rely on the state law will now see the advantages of greater harmonization among state and federal trademark laws,” he added.

Forty-six states have adopted some form of the model state trademark law, but Oregon becomes the third state, along with California and Mississippi, to adopt the newest version of the model bill which provides a cause of action for trademark dilution for marks that are famous within the state, and sets forth definitions and standards consistent with the federal Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006.

Source: ag-IP-news

oregon

Categories

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Join 147 other subscribers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Oregon Intellectual Property Blog
    • Subscribe Subscribed
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar

Loading Comments...